Berg M
Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, L4-117, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Med Inform. 2001 Dec;64(2-3):143-56. doi: 10.1016/s1386-5056(01)00200-3.
Successfully implementing patient care information systems (PCIS) in health care organizations appears to be a difficult task. After critically examining the very notions of 'success' and 'failure', and after discussing the problematic nature of lists of 'critical success- or failure factors', this paper discusses three myths that often hamper implementation processes. Alternative insights are presented, and illustrated with concrete examples. First of all, the implementation of a PCIS is a process of mutual transformation; the organization and the technology transform each other during the implementation process. When this is foreseen, PCIS implementations can be intended strategically to help transform the organization. Second, such a process can only get off the ground when properly supported by both central management and future users. A top down framework for the implementation is crucial to turn user-input into a coherent steering force, creating a solid basis for organizational transformation. Finally, the management of IS implementation processes is a careful balancing act between initiating organizational change, and drawing upon IS as a change agent, without attempting to pre-specify and control this process. Accepting, and even drawing upon, this inevitable uncertainty might be the hardest lesson to learn.
在医疗机构中成功实施患者护理信息系统(PCIS)似乎是一项艰巨的任务。在严格审视了“成功”与“失败”的概念,并讨论了“关键成功或失败因素”列表的问题性质之后,本文探讨了三个经常阻碍实施过程的误区。文中提出了不同的见解,并用具体例子加以说明。首先,PCIS的实施是一个相互转变的过程;在实施过程中,组织和技术相互转变。如果预见到这一点,PCIS的实施可以从战略上进行规划,以帮助转变组织。其次,这样一个过程只有在得到中央管理层和未来用户的适当支持时才能启动。自上而下的实施框架对于将用户输入转化为连贯的指导力量至关重要,为组织变革奠定坚实基础。最后,信息系统实施过程的管理是在启动组织变革和利用信息系统作为变革推动者之间进行谨慎的平衡行为,而不是试图预先规定和控制这个过程。接受,甚至利用这种不可避免的不确定性可能是最难学到的一课。