• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺原位癌:危险因素与筛查模式

Breast carcinoma in situ: risk factors and screening patterns.

作者信息

Claus E B, Stowe M, Carter D

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, P.O. Box 208034, Yale University School of Medicine, 60 College St., New Haven, CT 06520-8034, USA.

出版信息

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Dec 5;93(23):1811-7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.23.1811.

DOI:10.1093/jnci/93.23.1811
PMID:11734598
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Risk factors associated with invasive breast cancer are well documented, but those associated with breast carcinoma in situ are not well defined.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based, case-control study among female residents of Connecticut to identify risk factors for breast carcinoma in situ. Case patients, diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (n = 875) or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) (n = 123), were matched by 5-year age groups with control subjects (n = 999). Case patients were diagnosed between September 15, 1994, through March 14, 1998, and all subjects were between the ages of 20 and 79 years. Information on risk factors and cancer-screening history was collected by telephone interviews. Conditional logistic regression was used to determine odds ratios (ORs) for the association of these factors with the risk of DCIS and LCIS.

RESULTS

Case patients with DCIS were more likely than control subjects to report a family history of breast cancer (OR = 1.48; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.19 to 1.85) or previous breast biopsy (OR = 3.56; 95% CI = 2.86 to 4.43). They also had fewer full-term pregnancies (OR = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.80 to 0.93) and were older at first full-term pregnancy (OR for being 20-29 years old relative to being <20 years old = 1.68; 95% CI = 1.17 to 2.43) and at menopause (OR for being > or =55 years old relative to being <45 years old = 1.71; 95% CI = 1.05 to 2.77). DCIS case patients were more likely than control subjects to have had a mammographic examination (OR = 2.46; 95% CI = 1.78 to 3.40) or an annual clinical breast examination (OR = 1.83; 95% CI = 1.48 to 2.26). DCIS patients and control subjects did not differ with respect to oral contraceptive use, hormone replacement therapy, alcohol consumption or smoking history, or breast self-examination. Associations for LCIS were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk factors associated with DCIS and LCIS are similar to those associated with invasive breast cancer. Diagnosis of DCIS is associated with increased mammography screening.

摘要

背景

与浸润性乳腺癌相关的危险因素已有充分记录,但与原位乳腺癌相关的危险因素尚不明确。

方法

我们在康涅狄格州的女性居民中开展了一项基于人群的病例对照研究,以确定原位乳腺癌的危险因素。诊断为导管原位癌(DCIS)(n = 875)或小叶原位癌(LCIS)(n = 123)的病例患者,按5岁年龄组与对照受试者(n = 999)进行匹配。病例患者于1994年9月15日至1998年3月14日期间被诊断,所有受试者年龄在20至79岁之间。通过电话访谈收集危险因素和癌症筛查史的信息。采用条件逻辑回归确定这些因素与DCIS和LCIS风险关联的比值比(OR)。

结果

DCIS病例患者比对照受试者更有可能报告有乳腺癌家族史(OR = 1.48;95%置信区间[CI] = 1.19至1.85)或既往乳腺活检史(OR = 3.56;95%CI = 2.86至4.43)。她们的足月妊娠次数也较少(OR = 0.86;95%CI = 0.80至0.93),首次足月妊娠时年龄较大(相对于<20岁,20 - 29岁的OR = 1.68;95%CI = 1.17至2.43),绝经时年龄也较大(相对于<45岁,≥55岁的OR = 1.71;95%CI = 1.05至2.77)。DCIS病例患者比对照受试者更有可能进行过乳腺钼靶检查(OR = 2.46;95%CI = 1.78至3.40)或年度临床乳腺检查(OR = 1.83;95%CI = 1.48至2.26)。DCIS患者和对照受试者在口服避孕药使用、激素替代疗法、饮酒或吸烟史或乳腺自我检查方面没有差异。LCIS的关联情况相似。

结论

与DCIS和LCIS相关的危险因素与浸润性乳腺癌相关的危险因素相似。DCIS的诊断与乳腺钼靶筛查增加有关。

相似文献

1
Breast carcinoma in situ: risk factors and screening patterns.乳腺原位癌:危险因素与筛查模式
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Dec 5;93(23):1811-7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.23.1811.
2
Family history of breast and ovarian cancer and the risk of breast carcinoma in situ.乳腺癌和卵巢癌家族史与原位乳腺癌风险
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2003 Mar;78(1):7-15. doi: 10.1023/a:1022147920262.
3
Breast carcinoma in situ in 167 women--incidence, mode of presentation, therapy and follow-up.167例女性原位乳腺癌——发病率、临床表现、治疗及随访
Eur J Surg Oncol. 1991 Oct;17(5):466-76.
4
Comparison of risk factors for ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer.导管原位癌和浸润性乳腺癌危险因素的比较。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997 Jan 1;89(1):76-82. doi: 10.1093/jnci/89.1.76.
5
Oral contraceptives and the risk of ductal breast carcinoma in situ.口服避孕药与导管原位乳腺癌风险
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2003 Sep;81(2):129-36. doi: 10.1023/A:1025728524310.
6
Breast cancer risk factor associations differ for pure versus invasive carcinoma with an in situ component in case-control and case-case analyses.在病例对照和病例-病例分析中,纯癌与伴有原位成分的浸润性癌的乳腺癌风险因素关联有所不同。
Cancer Causes Control. 2016 Feb;27(2):183-98. doi: 10.1007/s10552-015-0696-z. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
7
Risk of invasive breast carcinoma among women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ and lobular carcinoma in situ, 1988-2001.1988 - 2001年原位导管癌和原位小叶癌女性患者发生浸润性乳腺癌的风险
Cancer. 2006 May 15;106(10):2104-12. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21864.
8
Comparison of the association of mammographic density and clinical factors with ductal carcinoma in situ versus invasive ductal breast cancer in Korean women.比较韩国女性的乳腺密度和临床因素与导管原位癌和浸润性导管乳腺癌的关联。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Dec 5;17(1):821. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3841-0.
9
The risk of a contralateral breast cancer among women diagnosed with ductal and lobular breast carcinoma in situ: data from the Connecticut Tumor Registry.导管原位癌和小叶原位癌女性患者对侧乳腺癌的风险:来自康涅狄格肿瘤登记处的数据。
Breast. 2003 Dec;12(6):451-6. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9776(03)00152-8.
10
The method of detection of ductal carcinoma in situ has no therapeutic implications: results of a population-based cohort study.原位导管癌的检测方法并无治疗意义:一项基于人群的队列研究结果
Breast Cancer Res. 2017 Mar 9;19(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13058-017-0819-4.

引用本文的文献

1
DCIS and LCIS: Are the Risk Factors for Developing In Situ Breast Cancer Different?导管原位癌和小叶原位癌:发生原位乳腺癌的危险因素是否不同?
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 2;15(17):4397. doi: 10.3390/cancers15174397.
2
Distinct Reproductive Risk Profiles for Intrinsic-Like Breast Cancer Subtypes: Pooled Analysis of Population-Based Studies.内在型乳腺癌亚型的独特生殖风险特征:基于人群的研究的汇总分析。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 Dec 8;114(12):1706-1719. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djac117.
3
Metastases after mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ of the male breast; A case report.
男性乳腺导管原位癌乳房切除术后转移;病例报告。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Mar 2;75:103451. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103451. eCollection 2022 Mar.
4
Risk factors for estrogen receptor positive ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in African American women.非裔美国女性中雌激素受体阳性乳腺导管原位癌的风险因素。
Breast. 2020 Feb;49:108-114. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.10.009. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
5
Frequency of pathogenic germline variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, CHEK2 and TP53 in ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed in women under the age of 50 years.50 岁以下女性导管原位癌中 BRCA1、BRCA2、PALB2、CHEK2 和 TP53 种系致病性变异的频率。
Breast Cancer Res. 2019 May 6;21(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13058-019-1143-y.
6
Risk factors for Luminal A ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive breast cancer in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study.卡罗莱纳乳腺癌研究中管腔 A 型乳腺导管原位癌(DCIS)和浸润性乳腺癌的危险因素。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):e0211488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211488. eCollection 2019.
7
Glucocorticoids promote transition of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive ductal carcinoma by inducing myoepithelial cell apoptosis.糖皮质激素通过诱导肌上皮细胞凋亡促进导管原位癌向浸润性导管癌的转化。
Breast Cancer Res. 2018 Jul 4;20(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13058-018-0977-z.
8
Epidemiologic Risk Factors for In Situ and Invasive Breast Cancers Among Postmenopausal Women in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study.美国国立卫生研究院-美国退休人员协会饮食与健康研究中绝经后女性原位和浸润性乳腺癌的流行病学危险因素
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Dec 15;186(12):1329-1340. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx206.
9
Genetic predisposition to ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.乳腺导管原位癌的遗传易感性。
Breast Cancer Res. 2016 Feb 17;18(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13058-016-0675-7.
10
Risk factors for young-onset invasive and in situ breast cancer.青年期浸润性和原位乳腺癌的危险因素。
Cancer Causes Control. 2015 Dec;26(12):1771-8. doi: 10.1007/s10552-015-0670-9. Epub 2015 Sep 25.