Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States of America.
Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):e0211488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211488. eCollection 2019.
Invasive breast cancers are thought to arise from in situ lesions, but some ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are indolent with low likelihood of progressing to invasive carcinoma. Comparison of risk factor associations between DCIS and invasive disease may elucidate which factors influence early versus late stages of carcinogenesis. Therefore, we determined whether there were differences in risk factor profiles for screen-detected DCIS and invasive breast cancer among Luminal A lesions.
We conducted a case-control analysis using data from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study (1993-2001). Analyses were restricted to Luminal A tumors and screen-detected tumors among mammography-eligible women, to limit confounding by mode of detection (N = 108 DCIS; N = 203 invasive). Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations between risk factors and lesion type.
In stratified analyses, we observed qualitative differences in the direction of association for ever smoking, obese BMI, high waist-to-hip-ratio (WHR), and ≥10 years of oral contraceptive use between DCIS and invasive disease. Breastfeeding was inversely associated with invasive disease and was not associated with DCIS. Interaction tests for risk factor associations between Luminal A DCIS and invasive breast cancer were not statistically significant (p>0.05).
Among Luminal A tumors, established breast cancer risk factors may exert stronger effects on progression of early lesions to invasive disease, with lesser effects on risk of DCIS.
浸润性乳腺癌被认为起源于原位病变,但有些导管原位癌(DCIS)生长缓慢,向浸润性癌进展的可能性较低。比较 DCIS 和浸润性疾病的危险因素相关性可以阐明哪些因素影响致癌作用的早期和晚期阶段。因此,我们确定了在 Luminal A 病变中,DCIS 和浸润性乳腺癌的筛检发现的 DCIS 之间的危险因素特征是否存在差异。
我们使用 Carolina Breast Cancer Study(1993-2001 年)的数据进行了病例对照分析。分析仅限于乳腺摄影合格的女性中的 Luminal A 肿瘤和筛检发现的肿瘤,以限制检测方式(N = 108 例 DCIS;N = 203 例浸润性)引起的混杂。逻辑回归用于估计危险因素与病变类型之间的比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。
在分层分析中,我们观察到在与 DCIS 和浸润性疾病之间的关联方向上,吸烟、肥胖 BMI、高腰臀比(WHR)和≥10 年口服避孕药使用之间存在定性差异。母乳喂养与浸润性疾病呈负相关,与 DCIS 无关。Luminal A DCIS 和浸润性乳腺癌之间的危险因素关联的交互检验无统计学意义(p>0.05)。
在 Luminal A 肿瘤中,已确定的乳腺癌危险因素可能对早期病变进展为浸润性疾病的作用更强,而对 DCIS 的风险作用较弱。