Heinrich H C
Arzneimittelforschung. 1975 Mar;25(3):420-6.
All available results from critical hemoglobin regeneration tests, postabsorption serum iron concentration studies, 59Fe erythrocyte incorporation and 59Fe whole-body retention measurements demonstrate that humans do absorb ferrous iron between 4 and 10 times (in the average about 5 times) better than ferric iron from therapeutic oral 50--250 mg iron doses. Ferrous sulfate iron is 3 to 4 times better available than the iron from ferric ammonium citrate or sulfate. Whereas 100 mg of ferrous sulfate iron/day are sufficient for an optimal oral compensation iron therapy and to produce initial hemoglobin regeneration rates of about 0.26 g/100 ml/day, 400 to 1000 mg of ferric iron/day are necessary for the same therapeutic effect because of the poor bioavailability of ferric iron. The ratio of the dose-absorption relationships for ferric and ferrous 59Fe was shown to decrease from 0.43 for a diagnostic 0.56 mg Fe dose to 0.21 for the therapeutic 50 mg Fe dose in subjects with normal iron stores. Absorption ratios of 0.65 for the 0.56 mg Fe dose and 0.26 for the 50 mg Fe dose were measured in subjects with depleted iron stores. At all dose levels the superior bioavailability of ferrous iron was demonstrable. A high-molecular weight ferric hydroxide-carbohydrate complex (MW similar to 30 000) was palatable but so poorly absorbed that is was practically without effect on hemoglobin regeneration even at a daily 300 mg Fe dose. Following several warnings such a useless commerecial oral iron preparation was finally withdrawn from the market. The iron from any high-molecular weight carbohydrate complex of ferric hydroxide has to be suspected to be poorly absorbed and therefore therapeutical useless, unless the opposite has been demonstrated with a reliable bioassay (59Fe absorption whole-body retention and hemoglobin regeneration test). A low-molecular weight so-called ferric hydroxide-fructose complex was shown to contain iron of more or less the same poor bioavailability as contained in ferric chloride since the iron from ferrous sulfate was about 5 times better absorable. The good absorption of ferrous sulfate iron was not further augmented by even very large oral doses of fructose since this carbohydrate did not improve the ferrous iron absorption at a fructose: Fe molar ratio of 106:1. Trivalent iron in simple compounds like ferric ammonium citrate or in low- and high-molecular weight carbohydrate complexes of ferric hydroxide is so poorly available for intestinal iron absorption in man that it cannot be used for a fast and reliable oral iron therapy with reasonably low doses as it can be easily practised with quick-lease preparations of ferrous sulfate at a 100 mg Fe2
所有关键血红蛋白再生试验、吸收后血清铁浓度研究、59Fe红细胞掺入及59Fe全身潴留测量的现有结果表明,对于治疗性口服50-250mg铁剂量,人体吸收亚铁的能力比吸收三价铁强4至10倍(平均约5倍)。硫酸亚铁中的铁比柠檬酸铁铵或硫酸铁中的铁的利用率高3至4倍。虽然每天100mg硫酸亚铁足以进行最佳口服补铁治疗,并能产生约0.26g/100ml/天的初始血红蛋白再生率,但由于三价铁的生物利用度差,要达到相同治疗效果,每天需要400至1000mg三价铁。在铁储备正常的受试者中,三价铁和亚铁59Fe的剂量-吸收关系比从诊断用0.56mg铁剂量时的0.43降至治疗用50mg铁剂量时的0.21。在铁储备耗竭的受试者中,0.56mg铁剂量的吸收比为0.65,50mg铁剂量的吸收比为0.26。在所有剂量水平下,亚铁的生物利用度均更高。一种高分子量氢氧化铁-碳水化合物复合物(分子量约为30000)口感良好,但吸收极差,即使每天服用300mg铁,对血红蛋白再生实际上也没有作用。经过多次警告后,这种无用的商业口服铁制剂最终退出市场。任何氢氧化铁高分子量碳水化合物复合物中的铁都可能吸收不良,因此治疗上无用,除非通过可靠的生物测定法(59Fe吸收、全身潴留和血红蛋白再生试验)证明情况相反。一种低分子量的所谓氢氧化铁-果糖复合物中的铁,其生物利用度与氯化铁中的铁大致相同,而硫酸亚铁中的铁的吸收性约高5倍。即使口服非常大剂量的果糖,也不会进一步提高硫酸亚铁中铁的良好吸收,因为在果糖与铁的摩尔比为106:y时,这种碳水化合物并不能改善亚铁的吸收。柠檬酸铁铵等简单化合物中的三价铁,或氢氧化铁的低分子量和高分子量碳水化合物复合物中的三价铁,在人体肠道铁吸收中利用率极低,因此不能用于快速可靠的口服补铁治疗,无法以合理低剂量给药,而硫酸亚铁速释制剂以100mg Fe2+则很容易做到这一点。