Wilson S E, Douketis J D, Crowther M A
St. Joseph's Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Chest. 2001 Dec;120(6):1972-6. doi: 10.1378/chest.120.6.1972.
(1) To determine physician preferences in the management of warfarin-induced excessive anticoagulation (AC); and (2) to assess compliance with the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines for the reversal of excessive AC.
Cross-sectional physician survey.
Members of the Canadian Society of Internal Medicine practicing in Ontario, Canada.
Physicians were asked to provide management preferences in six clinical scenarios describing warfarin-induced excessive AC. The scenarios represent various combinations of international normalized ratio (INR) value, treatment setting, and presence and severity of bleeding. In scenarios with INRs < 5.2 without bleeding, conservative approaches complying with the ACCP guidelines, such as withholding warfarin or reducing its dose, were most common. In scenarios with high INRs (ie, > 7.1) and/or bleeding, the selection of vitamin K in any form ranged between 71% and 82%. However, compliance with the ACCP-recommended doses and the routes of vitamin K administration ranged from 1 to 10%. In five of the six scenarios, subcutaneous injection, a route not recommended by the ACCP, was the most common method of vitamin K delivery.
Physician preferences for the reversal of warfarin-induced excessive AC were highly variable and, in most cases, did not follow the recommendations of the ACCP consensus guidelines. Furthermore, the widespread reported use of subcutaneous vitamin K is concerning because this route of vitamin K administration has been demonstrated to be less effective than IV administration of vitamin K. These findings highlight the need for randomized controlled trials to compare the efficacy of different routes of administration of vitamin K for warfarin-associated coagulopathy.
(1)确定医生在华法林所致过度抗凝(AC)管理方面的偏好;(2)评估对美国胸科医师学会(ACCP)关于过度AC逆转指南的遵循情况。
横断面医生调查。
在加拿大安大略省执业的加拿大内科医师协会成员。
要求医生在描述华法林所致过度AC的六种临床情景中提供管理偏好。这些情景代表了国际标准化比值(INR)值、治疗环境以及出血的存在和严重程度的各种组合。在INR < 5.2且无出血的情景中,遵循ACCP指南的保守方法,如停用华法林或降低其剂量,最为常见。在INR较高(即> 7.1)和/或有出血的情景中,任何形式维生素K的选择比例在71%至82%之间。然而,对ACCP推荐剂量和维生素K给药途径的遵循率在1%至10%之间。在六种情景中的五种情景中,皮下注射(一种ACCP不推荐的途径)是最常用的维生素K给药方法。
医生对华法林所致过度AC逆转的偏好差异很大,且在大多数情况下未遵循ACCP共识指南的建议。此外,广泛报道的皮下维生素K的使用令人担忧,因为已证明这种维生素K给药途径不如静脉注射维生素K有效。这些发现凸显了开展随机对照试验以比较不同维生素K给药途径对华法林相关凝血病疗效的必要性。