Suppr超能文献

在重症监护病房治疗的严重意外低温:预后与结局

Severe accidental hypothermia treated in an ICU: prognosis and outcome.

作者信息

Vassal T, Benoit-Gonin B, Carrat F, Guidet B, Maury E, Offenstadt G

机构信息

Service des Urgences, Hopital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.

出版信息

Chest. 2001 Dec;120(6):1998-2003. doi: 10.1378/chest.120.6.1998.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To assess the characteristics and outcomes of patients admitted to an ICU for severe accidental hypothermia, and to identify risk factors for mortality.

METHODS

All consecutive patients admitted to an ICU between January 1, 1979, and July 31, 1998, with a temperature of < or = 32 degrees C were retrospectively analyzed. Rewarming was always conducted passively with survival blankets and conventional covers. Prognostic factors were studied by means of univariate analysis (Mann-Whitney U and chi(2) tests) and multivariate analysis (logistic regression).

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients were enrolled (mean +/- SD age, 61.7 +/- 16 years). Five patients had a cardiac arrest before ICU admission. Patient characteristics at ICU admission were as follows: temperature, 28.8 +/- 2.5 degrees C; systolic BP, 85 +/- 23 mm Hg; heart rate, 60 +/- 24 beats/min; Glasgow Coma Scale, 10.4 +/- 3.7; and simplified acute physiology score (SAPS) II, 50.9 +/- 27. Mechanical ventilation was necessary in 23 cases, and 22 patients in shock received vasoactive drugs. The mean length of stay in the ICU was 6.7 +/- 9 days. Eighteen patients (38%) died, but ventricular arrhythmia was never the cause. Univariate analysis identified several prognostic factors (p < 0.05): age (57 +/- 16 years vs 69 +/- 14 years), systolic arterial BP (93 +/- 20 mm Hg vs 71 +/- 21 mm Hg), blood bicarbonate level (23.5 +/- 5.2 mmol/L vs 16.6 +/- 6.2 mmol/L), SAPS II score (35.3 +/- 19.5 vs 72 +/- 21), mechanical ventilation (34% vs 81%), vasopressor agents (42% vs 82%), rewarming time (11.5 +/- 7.2 h vs 17.2 +/- 7 h), and discovery of the patient at home (2.3% vs 54.5%). The initial temperature did not influence vital outcome (28.9 +/- 2.6 degrees C vs 28.6 +/- 2.2 degrees C). Only the use of vasoactive drugs (odds ratio, 9; 95% confidence interval, 1.6 to 50.1) was identified as a prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Severe accidental hypothermia is a rare cause of ICU admission in an urban area. Its mortality remains high, but there is no overmortality according to the SAPS II-derived prediction of death. Shock, requiring treatment with vasoactive drugs, is an independent risk factor for mortality, while initial core temperature is not. It remains to be determined whether aggressive rather than passive rewarming procedures are better.

摘要

研究目的

评估因严重意外低温入住重症监护病房(ICU)患者的特征及预后,并确定死亡风险因素。

方法

回顾性分析1979年1月1日至1998年7月31日期间入住ICU且体温≤32℃的所有连续患者。复温均采用保温毯和传统覆盖物进行被动复温。通过单因素分析(曼-惠特尼U检验和卡方检验)和多因素分析(逻辑回归)研究预后因素。

结果

共纳入47例患者(平均±标准差年龄,61.7±16岁)。5例患者在入住ICU前发生心脏骤停。入住ICU时患者特征如下:体温28.8±2.5℃;收缩压85±23mmHg;心率60±24次/分钟;格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为10.4±3.7;简化急性生理学评分(SAPS)II为50.9±27。23例患者需要机械通气,22例休克患者接受血管活性药物治疗。在ICU的平均住院时间为6.7±9天。18例患者(38%)死亡,但室性心律失常从未作为死因。单因素分析确定了几个预后因素(p<0.05):年龄(57±16岁对69±14岁)、收缩动脉压(93±20mmHg对71±21mmHg)、血碳酸氢盐水平(23.5±5.2mmol/L对16.6±6.2mmol/L)、SAPS II评分(35.3±19.5对72±21)、机械通气(34%对81%)、血管升压药(42%对82%)、复温时间(11.5±7.2小时对17.2±7小时)以及在家中发现患者(2.3%对54.5%)。初始体温不影响重要结局(28.9±2.6℃对28.6±2.2℃)。多因素分析中仅血管活性药物的使用(比值比,9;95%置信区间,1.6至50.1)被确定为预后因素。

结论

严重意外低温是城市地区入住ICU的罕见原因。其死亡率仍然很高,但根据SAPS II得出的死亡预测并无过高死亡率。需要血管活性药物治疗的休克是死亡的独立风险因素,而初始核心体温则不是。积极复温而非被动复温程序是否更好仍有待确定。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验