Roylance Rebecca, Gorman Patricia, Hanby Andrew, Tomlinson Ian
Molecular and Population Genetics Laboratory, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, 44 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PX, UK.
J Pathol. 2002 Jan;196(1):32-6. doi: 10.1002/path.1006.
It remains controversial as to whether low- and high-grade invasive ductal breast cancers are related by progression through grade, or generally follow distinct genetic pathways. It has previously been shown by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) that the latter is more likely to be correct, based on the high frequency of chromosome 16q deletion in grade I cancers, but not in grade III. This study used microsatellite markers on 16q to confirm the differences between grade I and grade III tumours and to exclude the possibility that grade III tumours generally arise from grade I tumours through a process involving regain of 16q. The concordance between the CGH and microsatellite data is good but imperfect, probably reflecting the different sensitivities and specificities of the two techniques and the varying mechanisms of allele loss in each tumour type.
低级别和高级别浸润性导管癌是通过分级进展相关联,还是通常遵循不同的遗传途径,这仍然存在争议。此前通过比较基因组杂交(CGH)研究表明,基于I级癌症中16q染色体缺失频率较高,而III级癌症中没有,后一种情况更有可能是正确的。本研究使用16q上的微卫星标记来确认I级和III级肿瘤之间的差异,并排除III级肿瘤通常通过涉及16q重新获得的过程从I级肿瘤发展而来的可能性。CGH数据和微卫星数据之间的一致性良好但并不完美,这可能反映了两种技术不同的敏感性和特异性,以及每种肿瘤类型中等位基因丢失的不同机制。