Suppr超能文献

儿童和成人患者的射频消融术:比较结果

Radiofrequency ablation in pediatric and adult patients: comparative results.

作者信息

Manolis A S, Vassilikos V, Maounis T N, Chiladakis J, Cokkinos D V

机构信息

Cardiology Division, Patras University, Patras, Greece.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2001 Dec;5(4):443-53. doi: 10.1023/a:1013254230114.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation has been widely and successfully employed to cure adult and pediatric patients of a variety of arrhythmias. Only limited data exist which compare the results in these two groups. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of RF catheter ablation in pediatric versus adult patients performed by an adult electrophysiology (EP) team.

METHODS

The study group included 327 consecutive pediatric (n=47) and adult (n=280) patients, aged 7-82 years (mean 40+/-19), with symptomatic tachyarrhythmias, who underwent RF ablation during the last 6 years. All but ten patients underwent a full EP study during the same session. Procedures were performed in all but five patients with use of local anesthesia and deep or light sedation. The left heart was approached with use of transaortic (n=36) or transseptal (n=55) or both (n=6) techniques. RF ablation was performed for manifest or concealed accessory pathways in 132 patients, AV nodal slow pathway in 119, atrial tachycardia in 24, atrial flutter in 15, atrial fibrillation in one, ventricular tachycardia in 29, and AV node/His bundle in 7 patients.

RESULTS

RF ablation was successful in 271 (96.8%) patients in the adult group and in all patients (100%) in the pediatric group, with a mean of 15+/-18 (median: 8) vs 12+/-10 (median: 8) RF applications respectively (P=NS). Complications occurred in four patients (1.4%) in the adult group and in one patient (2.1%) in the pediatric group (P=NS). Fluoroscopy time averaged 43+/-40 min vs 39+/-27 min and procedures lasted for 3.0+/-1.9 hours vs 2.8+/-1.4 hours respectively (P=NS). During long-term follow-up of 25+/-19 months, there were 12 (4.4%) recurrences among the adult patients, and three (6.4%) recurrences in children, with nine of them successfully treated with repeat RF ablation. Procedural variables were dependent on the type of arrhythmia ablated, rather than on patient's age. Patients with multiple accessory pathways or atrial flutter required the greatest number of RF applications and the longest fluoroscopy exposure and duration of the procedure; the lowest values of these variables concerned ablation of the slow AV nodal pathway or the AV node/His bundle.

CONCLUSION

RF ablation in adult and pediatric patients performed by an adult EP team is equally efficacious and safe offering cure of symptomatic cardiac tachyarrhythmias in both patient populations.

摘要

背景

射频(RF)导管消融术已被广泛且成功地用于治疗成人和儿童的各种心律失常。比较这两组治疗结果的数据有限。本研究的目的是比较由成人电生理(EP)团队进行的儿童与成人患者射频导管消融的疗效和安全性。

方法

研究组包括327例连续的儿童(n = 47)和成人(n = 280)患者,年龄7 - 82岁(平均40±19岁),有症状性快速心律失常,在过去6年中接受了射频消融。除10例患者外,所有患者在同一次手术中进行了全面的电生理检查。除5例患者外,所有手术均在局部麻醉和深度或轻度镇静下进行。采用经主动脉(n = 36)或经房间隔(n = 55)或两者联合(n = 6)技术进入左心。132例患者因显性或隐匿性旁路进行射频消融,119例因房室结慢径路,24例因房性心动过速,15例因心房扑动,1例因心房颤动,29例因室性心动过速,7例因房室结/希氏束进行射频消融。

结果

成人组271例(96.8%)患者射频消融成功,儿童组所有患者(100%)成功,平均分别进行15±18次(中位数:8次)与12±10次(中位数:8次)射频应用(P = 无显著性差异)。成人组4例患者(1.4%)出现并发症,儿童组1例患者(2.1%)出现并发症(P = 无显著性差异)。透视时间平均为43±40分钟与39±27分钟,手术持续时间分别为3.0±1.9小时与2.8±1.4小时(P = 无显著性差异)。在25±19个月的长期随访中,成人患者中有12例(4.4%)复发,儿童中有3例(6.4%)复发,其中9例通过重复射频消融成功治疗。手术变量取决于消融的心律失常类型,而非患者年龄。有多条旁路或心房扑动的患者需要最多的射频应用次数、最长的透视时间和手术持续时间;这些变量的最低值与房室结慢径路或房室结/希氏束消融有关。

结论

由成人EP团队对成人和儿童患者进行射频消融同样有效且安全,能治愈这两类患者的症状性心脏快速心律失常。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验