van Haaften-Day C, Shen Y, Xu F, Yu Y, Berchuck A, Havrilesky L J, de Bruijn H W, van der Zee A G, Bast R C, Hacker N F
Gynecologic Cancer Center, The Royal Hospital for Women, Randwick, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Cancer. 2001 Dec 1;92(11):2837-44. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20011201)92:11<2837::aid-cncr10093>3.0.co;2-5.
Ovarian carcinoma remains the leading cause of death from gynecologic malignancy in Australia, the Netherlands, and the United States. CA-125-II, the most widely used serum marker, has limited sensitivity and specificity for detecting small-volume, early-stage disease. Therefore, a panel of three serum tumor markers-OVX1, CA-125-II, and macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF)-has been used to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of multiple markers for the detection of early-stage ovarian carcinoma.
Preoperative serum levels of OVX1, CA-125-II, and M-CSF were measured in 281 patients with primary ovarian epithelial tumors of different histotypes. Among these tumors, 175 were malignant, 29 were of borderline malignancy, and 77 were benign. The three markers also were measured in sera from 117 apparently healthy women. Marker levels were considered abnormal at CA-125-II > 35 U/mL, OVX1 > 7.2 U/mL, and M-CSF > 3.5 ng/mL.
Among 175 women with malignant ovarian tumors, at least one of the three serum markers was elevated in 85%, whereas CA-125-II was elevated in 80% (P = 0.008). In 58 patients with Stage I ovarian carcinoma, at least one of the three serum markers was elevated in 76%, whereas CA-125 levels were elevated in 66% (P = 0.04). For patients with borderline and benign tumors, a combination of the three antigens had slightly higher sensitivity compared with CA-125-II, but the differences were not statistically significant. Among 117 apparently healthy women, CA-125-II was elevated in 4%, and one of the three markers was positive in 17%.
The sensitivity of a combination of three serum markers was significantly greater than the sensitivity of the CA-125-II assay alone in patients with primary ovarian epithelial tumors of different histotypes. This was true for all stages, including early-stage, potentially curable disease. When used as single markers, however, only the CA-125-II assay could distinguish invasive Stage I tumors from apparently healthy women.
在澳大利亚、荷兰和美国,卵巢癌仍是妇科恶性肿瘤致死的主要原因。CA - 125 - II是应用最广泛的血清标志物,但其在检测小体积、早期疾病时敏感性和特异性有限。因此,一组三种血清肿瘤标志物——OVX1、CA - 125 - II和巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(M - CSF)——已被用于评估多种标志物检测早期卵巢癌的敏感性和特异性。
对281例不同组织学类型的原发性卵巢上皮性肿瘤患者术前血清中的OVX1、CA - 125 - II和M - CSF水平进行检测。在这些肿瘤中,175例为恶性,29例为交界性恶性,77例为良性。还对117名明显健康女性的血清进行了这三种标志物的检测。当CA - 125 - II>35 U/mL、OVX1>7.2 U/mL和M - CSF>3.5 ng/mL时,标志物水平被视为异常。
在175例患有恶性卵巢肿瘤的女性中,三种血清标志物中至少有一种升高的占85%,而CA - 125 - II升高的占80%(P = 0.008)。在58例I期卵巢癌患者中,三种血清标志物中至少有一种升高的占76%,而CA - 125水平升高的占66%(P = 0.04)。对于交界性和良性肿瘤患者,三种抗原联合检测的敏感性略高于CA - 125 - II,但差异无统计学意义。在117名明显健康的女性中,CA - 125 - II升高的占4%,三种标志物中有一项呈阳性的占17%。
在不同组织学类型的原发性卵巢上皮性肿瘤患者中,三种血清标志物联合检测的敏感性显著高于单独检测CA - 125 - II的敏感性。在所有阶段都是如此,包括早期、可能治愈的疾病。然而,当作为单一标志物使用时,只有CA - 125 - II检测能够区分I期浸润性肿瘤与明显健康的女性。