Moorthy S S, Laurent B, Pandya P, Fry V
Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Administration Medical Center, and Department of Anesthesia, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
J Clin Anesth. 2001 Dec;13(8):582-4. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(01)00334-8.
We report an anaphylactoid reaction to etomidate twice in a 60-year-old male with coronary artery disease and peripheral vascular disease. Following the first anaphylactoid reaction, the patient developed myocardial infarction. In addition, the patient's blood was moderately positive for latex antibodies, which made the differential diagnosis difficult. We concluded that the patient had anaphylactoid reaction to etomidate due to the temporal relationship to induction with the drug. The patient did not manifest similar reaction to other induction drugs used for other surgeries. The patient recovered from both incidents of anaphylactoid reaction to etomidate following intravenous administration of epinephrine and fluids.
我们报告了一名60岁患有冠状动脉疾病和周围血管疾病的男性患者两次发生依托咪酯类过敏反应。首次发生类过敏反应后,该患者出现心肌梗死。此外,患者血液中的乳胶抗体呈中度阳性,这使得鉴别诊断变得困难。我们得出结论,由于该药物诱导与发病存在时间关系,患者对依托咪酯发生了类过敏反应。该患者对用于其他手术的其他诱导药物未表现出类似反应。静脉注射肾上腺素和补液后,患者从两次依托咪酯类过敏反应事件中康复。