Nordmann Jean-Philippe, Mertz Beat, Yannoulis Natalia C, Schwenninger Christine, Kapik Barry, Shams Naveed
Hôpital National d'Ophtalmologie des Quinze Vingts, Paris, France.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2002 Jan;133(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(01)01337-x.
A long-term comparison of the ocular hypotensive efficacy and safety of unoprostone isopropyl 0.15% twice daily with that of timolol maleate 0.5% twice daily and betaxolol HCl 0.5% twice daily.
This was a randomized, multicenter, double-masked, active-controlled 24-month clinical trial involving 27 centers in Europe and Israel.
The study population was composed of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (including pseudoexfoliation) or ocular hypertension. After washout of antiglaucoma medications, intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured at 0, + 2, + 8, and + 12 hours. Patients were randomized in a 2:1:1 ratio to unoprostone, timolol, or betaxolol. Patients returned for examinations at 2 and 6 weeks and 3 and 6 months.
556 patients were randomized. Each drug produced a clinically and statistically (P <.001) significant reduction from baseline in 12-hour diurnal IOP at month 6 (- 4.3 mm Hg, unoprostone; - 5.8 mm Hg, timolol; - 4.9 mm Hg, betaxolol). Differences in adjusted treatment means between unoprostone and timolol and unoprostone and betaxolol were 1.57 mm Hg (95% CI: 1.00, 2.13) and 0.53 mm Hg (95% CI: - 0.03, 1.09), respectively. Unoprostone was clinically equivalent to betaxolol but did not have as great an IOP-lowering effect as timolol. Discontinued for inadequate control of IOP were 7%, 1%, and 4% of the patients for unoprostone, timolol, and betaxolol, respectively. There were no changes of note in visual acuity, pupil size, cup-to-disk ratio, visual fields, or iris color. Changes in heart rate and blood pressure were small, with no clinically significant differences between groups.
Unoprostone provided a clinically significant IOP-lowering effect equivalent to betaxolol but not to timolol. The side effect profile of unoprostone appears to be comparable to other established IOP-lowering agents.
比较0.15%异丙酸乌诺前列酮每日两次、0.5%马来酸噻吗洛尔每日两次和0.5%盐酸倍他洛尔每日两次的降眼压疗效及安全性的长期对比研究。
这是一项随机、多中心、双盲、活性药物对照的24个月临床试验,涉及欧洲和以色列的27个中心。
研究人群包括原发性开角型青光眼(包括假性剥脱性青光眼)或高眼压症患者。停用抗青光眼药物后,在0、+2、+8和+12小时测量眼压(IOP)。患者按2:1:1的比例随机分为接受乌诺前列酮、噻吗洛尔或倍他洛尔治疗组。患者在2周和6周、3个月和6个月时返回进行检查。
556例患者被随机分组。在第6个月时,每种药物均使12小时日间眼压较基线有临床和统计学意义(P<.001)的显著降低(异丙酸乌诺前列酮降低4.3mmHg;噻吗洛尔降低5.8mmHg;盐酸倍他洛尔降低4.9mmHg)。异丙酸乌诺前列酮与噻吗洛尔以及异丙酸乌诺前列酮与盐酸倍他洛尔之间调整后的治疗均值差异分别为1.57mmHg(95%CI:1.00,2.13)和0.53mmHg(95%CI:-0.03,1.09)。异丙酸乌诺前列酮在临床上与盐酸倍他洛尔等效,但降眼压效果不如噻吗洛尔。因眼压控制不佳而停药的患者中,使用异丙酸乌诺前列酮、噻吗洛尔和盐酸倍他洛尔的分别为7%、1%和4%。视力、瞳孔大小、杯盘比、视野或虹膜颜色均无明显变化。心率和血压变化较小,各组间无临床显著差异。
异丙酸乌诺前列酮具有临床显著的降眼压效果,与盐酸倍他洛尔等效,但不如噻吗洛尔。异丙酸乌诺前列酮的副作用谱似乎与其他已确立的降眼压药物相当。