Suppr超能文献

联合局部抗青光眼治疗——噻吗洛尔与乌诺前列酮对比倍他洛尔与乌诺前列酮的长期疗效和安全性

[Long-term efficacy and safety of combined topical antiglaucoma therapy--timolol & unoprostone vs. betaxolol & unoprostone].

作者信息

Ohtake Yuichiro, Tanino Tomihiko, Kimura Itaru, Mashima Yukihiko, Oguchi Yoshihisa

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.

出版信息

Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2004 Jan;108(1):23-8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate long-term efficacy and safety of treatment combining topical beta-blockers and isopropyl unoprostone in primary open-angle glaucoma and normal-tension glaucoma patients.

METHODS

A prospective, open-label, parallel-group clinical comparison trial was performed to evaluate efficacy and safety of treatment combining 0.5% betaxolol and 0.12% isopropyl unoprostone (B&U) or 0.5% timolol and 0.12% isopropyl unoprostone (T&U). Forty eyes of 40 patients, which were matched in the aging and the stage of glaucomatous visual field defect, were studied. Twenty patients were treated with B&U and the other twenty patients with T&U twice daily for 24 months. Goldmann intraocular pressure(IOP), Humphrey automated perimetry, blood pressure, heart rate, and peak flow were done every six months in each group.

RESULTS

In the B&U treatment group, mean IOP was 21.2 mmHg at baseline and 18.3 mmHg(p < 0.005) after 2 years, and in the T&U treatment group it was 21.1 mmHg at baseline and 17.9 mmHg (p < 0.001) after 2 years. The cases in which MD value decreased over 2 dB were one in the B&U treatment group and three in the T&U treatment group. The average MD value was significantly improved from -7.40 dB to -5.90 dB after 2 years with B&U treatment(p < 0.05), but there was no difference with the T&U treatment. None of the patients stopped combined therapy because of side effects, though heart rate was significantly reduced only in T&U treatment group.

CONCLUSION

Both combined treatments were effective for IOP reduction in glaucoma patients, and the data from the B&U treatment group suggested that B&U was more effective in maintaining visual field than T&U.

摘要

目的

评估局部使用β受体阻滞剂与异丙前列醇联合治疗原发性开角型青光眼和正常眼压性青光眼患者的长期疗效和安全性。

方法

进行一项前瞻性、开放标签、平行组临床对照试验,以评估0.5%倍他洛尔与0.12%异丙前列醇(B&U)联合治疗或0.5%噻吗洛尔与0.12%异丙前列醇(T&U)联合治疗的疗效和安全性。研究了40例患者的40只眼睛,这些眼睛在年龄和青光眼视野缺损阶段相匹配。20例患者接受B&U治疗,另外20例患者接受T&U治疗,每日两次,持续24个月。每组每6个月测量一次Goldmann眼压(IOP)、Humphrey自动视野计、血压、心率和峰值流速。

结果

在B&U治疗组中,基线时平均IOP为21.2 mmHg,2年后为18.3 mmHg(p<(0.005));在T&U治疗组中,基线时为21.1 mmHg,2年后为17.9 mmHg(p<(0.001))。B&U治疗组中MD值下降超过2 dB的病例有1例,T&U治疗组有3例。B&U治疗2年后,平均MD值从(-7.40) dB显著改善至(-5.90) dB(p<(0.05)),但与T&U治疗组无差异。尽管仅在T&U治疗组中心率显著降低,但没有患者因副作用而停止联合治疗。

结论

两种联合治疗对降低青光眼患者的眼压均有效,B&U治疗组的数据表明,B&U在维持视野方面比T&U更有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验