• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

框架很重要:生态社会、健康与人权视角下的女性健康差异——以结核病为例

Frameworks matter: ecosocial and health and human rights perspectives on disparities in women's health--the case of tuberculosis.

作者信息

Krieger N, Gruskin S

机构信息

Department of Health and Social Behavior, Center for Society and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972). 2001 Fall;56(4):137-42.

PMID:11759780
Abstract

Frameworks matter. To understand, intervene in, and improve the health of girls and women requires more than just good intentions and an eclectic list of "risk factors" or policy prescriptions, even if dressed up in notions of "gender." In this article, we present two frameworks-ecosocial and health and human rights-that, if considered singly and in combination, we believe could prove useful to furthering work on understanding and addressing societal patterns of health, disease, and well-being. After explicitly summarizing our theoretical stances, we sketch the kinds of questions these frameworks invite us to consider, with reference to a particular case example: women and tuberculosis. By taking on the challenge of articulating and applying our frameworks, separately and in relation to each other, we hope to deepen understanding and generate new ideas that can make a difference for the health of girls and women.

摘要

框架至关重要。要理解、干预并改善女孩和妇女的健康状况,仅靠良好的意愿以及一堆杂乱无章的“风险因素”或政策处方是不够的,即便这些都披上了“性别”的外衣。在本文中,我们提出了两个框架——生态社会框架以及健康与人权框架,我们认为,无论是单独考虑还是综合考虑,这两个框架都有助于推动我们在理解和应对健康、疾病及幸福的社会模式方面的工作。在明确总结我们的理论立场之后,我们结合一个具体案例——妇女与结核病,概述这些框架促使我们思考的各类问题。通过迎接分别阐述和应用这些框架以及相互关联地阐述和应用这些框架的挑战,我们希望加深理解并产生能够对女孩和妇女的健康产生影响的新想法。

相似文献

1
Frameworks matter: ecosocial and health and human rights perspectives on disparities in women's health--the case of tuberculosis.框架很重要:生态社会、健康与人权视角下的女性健康差异——以结核病为例
J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972). 2001 Fall;56(4):137-42.
2
Identifying the links between violence against women and HIV/AIDS: ecosocial and human rights frameworks offer insight into U.S. prevention policies.识别针对妇女的暴力行为与艾滋病毒/艾滋病之间的联系:生态社会和人权框架为美国的预防政策提供了见解。
Health Hum Rights. 2006;9(2):40-61.
3
Reframing women's risk: social inequalities and HIV infection.重新界定女性面临的风险:社会不平等与艾滋病毒感染
Annu Rev Public Health. 1997;18:401-36. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.18.1.401.
4
Gender, race + geography = jeopardy: marginalized women, human rights and HIV in the United States.性别、种族+地理位置=危险:美国被边缘化的妇女、人权与艾滋病毒。
Womens Health Issues. 2011 Nov;21(6 Suppl):S243-9. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2011.07.008.
5
Infectious diseases and women's health: link to social and economic development.传染病与妇女健康:与社会和经济发展的联系
J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972). 2001 Summer;56(3):92-3.
6
Using grounded theory to generate a theoretical understanding of the effects of child custody policy on women's health promotion in the context of intimate partner violence.运用扎根理论,在亲密伴侣暴力的背景下,对子女监护政策对女性健康促进的影响形成理论理解。
Health Care Women Int. 2006 Jun-Jul;27(6):490-512. doi: 10.1080/07399330600770221.
7
Sex, gender, and tuberculosis.性别、社会性别与结核病
Lancet. 1999 Mar 20;353(9157):1000-1. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01318-5.
8
Global inequalities and human rights in women's sexual and reproductive health.全球女性性健康和生殖健康方面的不平等与人权
Gac Med Mex. 2006 Sep-Oct;142 Suppl 2:5-11.
9
An analysis of the women's health movement and its impact on the delivery of health care within the United States.对美国女性健康运动及其对医疗保健服务影响的分析。
Nurse Pract. 1995 Nov;20(11 Pt 1):24, 27-8, 30-1, passim.
10
Reflections on emerging frameworks of health and human rights.关于健康与人权新框架的思考
Health Hum Rights. 1995;1(4):314-48.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical Frameworks and Global Health: A Narrative Review of the "Leave No One Behind" Principle.伦理框架与全球健康:“不让任何人掉队”原则的叙事性综述。
Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241288346. doi: 10.1177/00469580241288346.
2
Health Care for All: Undocumented Migrants and the COVID-19 Pandemic in Alberta, Canada-A Scoping Review.全民医疗保健:加拿大艾伯塔省的无证移民与新冠疫情——一项范围综述
J Migr Health. 2023;7:100192. doi: 10.1016/j.jmh.2023.100192. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
3
Joint effects of individual socioeconomic status and residential neighborhood context on vaginal microbiome composition.
个体社会经济地位与居住社区环境对阴道微生物组组成的联合影响。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 24;11:1029741. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1029741. eCollection 2023.
4
Health-related quality of life of patients with haemophilia: a cross-sectional survey in the Northeast of China.血友病患者的健康相关生活质量:中国东北地区的一项横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 1;12(2):e056668. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056668.
5
Integrating Education on Addressing Health Disparities into the Graduate Social Work Curriculum.将解决健康差异问题的教育纳入研究生社会工作课程。
J Teach Soc Work. 2012;32(5):471-486. doi: 10.1080/08841233.2012.725458. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
6
Prevalence and correlates of unintended pregnancy in Ghana: Analysis of 2014 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey.加纳意外怀孕的患病率及其相关因素:对2014年加纳人口与健康调查的分析。
Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2018 Sep 5;4:17. doi: 10.1186/s40748-018-0085-1. eCollection 2018.
7
Felon disenfranchisement in the United States: a health equity perspective.美国的重罪犯被剥夺选举权:一个公平健康视角。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Apr;103(4):632-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300933. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
8
A rights-based approach to food insecurity in the United States.美国应对粮食不安全问题的基于权利的方法。
Am J Public Health. 2009 Jul;99(7):1203-11. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.130229. Epub 2009 May 14.
9
The right to health under international law and its relevance to the United States.国际法规定的健康权及其与美国的相关性。
Am J Public Health. 2005 Jul;95(7):1156-61. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.055111. Epub 2005 Jun 2.
10
Child custody determinations in cases involving intimate partner violence: a human rights analysis.涉及亲密伴侣暴力案件中的子女监护权判定:人权分析
Am J Public Health. 2004 Jun;94(6):951-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.6.951.