Thoennissen J, Herkner H, Lang W, Domanovits H, Laggner A N, Müllner M
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Vienna Medical School, Austria.
CMAJ. 2001 Nov 13;165(10):1311-6.
Headache after cervical or lumbar puncture has long been attributed to early mobilization; however, there is little evidence for this. We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to assess whether longer bed rest is better than immediate mobilization or short bed rest in preventing headache.
We searched EMBASE (1988 to March 2001), MEDLINE (1966 to May 2001), Pascal Biomed (1996 to February 2001), Current Contents (1997 to September 1999), PsycINFO (1966 to May 2001), the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register (last search May 15, 2001), textbooks and references of the papers selected. Studies were eligible if patients underwent cervical or lumbar puncture for any reason and were randomly assigned to either a long or a short period of bed rest. Data were abstracted independently by 2 investigators to a predefined form.
We found 16 randomized controlled trials involving 1083 patients assigned to immediate mobilization or a short period of bed rest (up to 8 hours) and 1128 patients assigned to a longer period of bed rest (0.5 to 24 hours). Puncture was performed for anesthesia (5 trials), myelography (6 trials) and diagnostic reasons (5 trials). None of the trials showed that longer bed rest was superior to immediate mobilization or short bed rest for preventing headache after puncture. When pooling the results of the trials in the myelography group and the diagnostic group, the relative risks of headache after puncture were 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81-1.08) and 0.97 (95% CI 0.79-1.19) respectively. We did not pool the results from the trials in the anesthesia group because of clinical heterogeneity, but shorter bed rest appeared to be superior.
There was no evidence that longer bed rest after cervical or lumbar puncture was better than immediate mobilization or short bed rest in reducing the incidence of headache.
长期以来,人们一直认为颈腰椎穿刺后头痛是由于过早活动所致;然而,几乎没有证据支持这一观点。我们对随机对照试验进行了系统的文献综述和荟萃分析,以评估在预防头痛方面,延长卧床休息时间是否优于立即活动或短期卧床休息。
我们检索了EMBASE(1988年至2001年3月)、MEDLINE(1966年至2001年5月)、Pascal Biomed(1996年至2001年2月)、《现刊目次》(1997年至1999年9月)、PsycINFO(1966年至2001年5月)、Cochrane对照试验注册库(最后检索时间为2001年5月15日)、教科书以及所选论文的参考文献。如果患者因任何原因接受了颈腰椎穿刺,并被随机分配到长时间或短时间卧床休息组,则这些研究符合纳入标准。由2名研究人员将数据独立提取到预定义的表格中。
我们发现16项随机对照试验,其中1083例患者被分配到立即活动或短期卧床休息组(最长8小时),1128例患者被分配到较长时间卧床休息组(0.5至24小时)。穿刺用于麻醉(5项试验)、脊髓造影(六项试验)和诊断目的(5项试验)。没有一项试验表明,在预防穿刺后头痛方面,延长卧床休息时间优于立即活动或短期卧床休息。将脊髓造影组和诊断组试验的结果合并时,穿刺后头痛的相对风险分别为0.93(95%置信区间[CI]0.81 - 1.08)和0.97(95%CI 0.79 - 1.19)。由于临床异质性,我们没有合并麻醉组试验的结果,但较短时间卧床休息似乎更具优势。
没有证据表明颈腰椎穿刺后延长卧床休息时间在降低头痛发生率方面优于立即活动或短期卧床休息。