Struijs P A, Smidt N, Arola H, van Dijk C N, Buchbinder R, Assendelft W J
Academic Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Nov;51(472):924-9.
Lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow) is af requently reported condition. A wide variety of treatment strategies has been described. Asy et, no optimal strategy has been identified. The aim of this review was to assess the effectiveness of orthotic devices for treatment of tennis elbow. An electronic database search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register Current Contents, and reference listsf rom all retrieved articles. Experts on the subjects were approachedfor additional trials. All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) descrbiing individuals with diagnosed lateral epicondylitis and assessing the use of an orthotic device as a treatment strategy were evaluatedfor inclusion. Two reviewers independently assessed the validity of the included trials and extracted data on relevant outcome measures. Dichotomous outcomes were expressed as relative risks and continuous outcomes as standardised mean differences, both with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Statistical pooling and subgroup analyses were intended. Five small-size RCTs (n = 7-49 per group) were included the validity score ranged from three to nine positive items out of 11. Subgroup analyses were not performed owing to the small number of trials. The limited number of included trials present few outcome measures and limited long-term results. Pooling was not possible owing to the high level of heterogeneity of the trials. No definitive conclusions can be drawn concerning effectiveness of orthotic devices for lateral epicondylitis. More well-designed and well-conducted RCTs of sufficient power are warranted.
外侧上髁炎(网球肘)是一种经常被报道的病症。已经描述了各种各样的治疗策略。然而,尚未确定最佳策略。本综述的目的是评估矫形器治疗网球肘的有效性。使用MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、Cochrane对照试验注册库《现刊目次》以及所有检索文章的参考文献列表进行了电子数据库搜索。还联系了该领域的专家以获取更多试验。对所有描述诊断为外侧上髁炎的个体并评估将矫形器作为一种治疗策略使用情况的随机对照试验(RCT)进行了纳入评估。两名评审员独立评估了纳入试验的有效性,并提取了相关结局指标的数据。二分法结局以相对风险表示,连续结局以标准化均值差表示,两者均带有相应的95%置信区间。旨在进行统计合并和亚组分析。纳入了5项小型RCT(每组n = 7 - 49),有效性评分在11项中的阳性项目数为3至9项。由于试验数量少,未进行亚组分析。纳入试验数量有限,提供的结局指标很少且长期结果有限。由于试验的异质性程度高,无法进行合并。关于矫形器治疗外侧上髁炎的有效性无法得出明确结论。需要更多设计良好且实施得当、有足够效力的RCT。