Suppr超能文献

注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)DSM-IV亚型的神经心理学特征比较。

A comparison of the neuropsychological profiles of the DSM-IV subtypes of ADHD.

作者信息

Chhabildas N, Pennington B F, Willcutt E G

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Denver, Colorado 80208, USA.

出版信息

J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2001 Dec;29(6):529-40. doi: 10.1023/a:1012281226028.

Abstract

Recent research on the DSM-IV subtypes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has demonstrated that the subtypes differ in demographic characteristics, types of functional impairment, and profiles of comorbidity with other childhood disorders. However, little research has tested whether the subtypes differ in underlying neuropsychological deficits. This study compared the neuropsychological profiles of children without ADHD (n = 82) and children who met symptom criteria for DSM-IV Predominantly Inattentive subtype (ADHD-IA; n = 67), Predominantly Hyperactive Impulsive subtype (ADHD-HI; n = 14), and Combined subtype (ADHD-C; n = 33) in the areas of processing speed, vigilance, and inhibition. We hypothesized that children with elevations of inattention symptoms (ADHD-IA and ADHD-C) would be impaired on measures of vigilance and processing speed, whereas children with significant hyperactivity/impulsivity (ADHD-HI and ADHD-C) would be impaired on measures of inhibition. Contrary to prediction, symptoms of inattention best predicted performance on all dependent measures, and ADHD-IA and ADHD-C children had similar profiles of impairment. In contrast, children with ADHD-HI were not significantly impaired on any dependent measures once subclinical symptoms of inattention were controlled. Our results do not support distinct neuropsychological deficits in ADHD-IA and ADHD-C children, and suggest that symptoms of inattention, rather than symptoms of hyperactivity/impulsivity, are associated with neuropsychological impairment.

摘要

近期对注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)DSM-IV亚型的研究表明,这些亚型在人口统计学特征、功能损害类型以及与其他儿童疾病的共病情况方面存在差异。然而,很少有研究检验这些亚型在潜在神经心理缺陷方面是否存在差异。本研究比较了无ADHD儿童(n = 82)以及符合DSM-IV主要注意力不集中亚型(ADHD-IA;n = 67)、主要多动冲动亚型(ADHD-HI;n = 14)和混合型(ADHD-C;n = 33)症状标准的儿童在处理速度、警觉性和抑制方面的神经心理特征。我们假设,注意力不集中症状加重的儿童(ADHD-IA和ADHD-C)在警觉性和处理速度测量方面会受损,而多动/冲动明显的儿童(ADHD-HI和ADHD-C)在抑制测量方面会受损。与预测相反,注意力不集中症状最能预测所有相关测量的表现,且ADHD-IA和ADHD-C儿童具有相似的损害特征。相比之下,一旦控制了注意力不集中的亚临床症状,ADHD-HI儿童在任何相关测量中均未出现明显受损。我们的结果不支持ADHD-IA和ADHD-C儿童存在明显的神经心理缺陷,并表明注意力不集中症状而非多动/冲动症状与神经心理损害相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验