Gaub M, Carlson C L
University of Texas at Austin 78712, USA.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1997 Apr;25(2):103-11. doi: 10.1023/a:1025775311259.
From an ethnically diverse sample of 2,744 school children, 221 attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) [123 (4.5%) predominantly inattentive (IA), 47 (1.7%) predominantly hyperactive/impulsive (HI), and 51 (19%) combined type (C)] were identified using teacher ratings on a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.)(DSM-IV) symptom checklist. Subjects were compared to 221 controls on teacher ratings of behavioral, academic, and social functioning. The results revealed relatively independent areas of impairment for each diagnostic group. The IA children were impaired in all areas, but were rated as displaying more appropriate behavior and fewer externalizing problems than HI or C children. The HI group displayed externalizing and social problems, but was rated as no different than controls in learning or internalizing problems. The C group demonstrated severe and pervasive difficulties across domains. These findings support the validity of the DSM-IV ADHD subtypes; all ADHD groups demonstrated impairment relative to controls, but show different patterns of behavioral characteristics.
从2744名来自不同种族的学童样本中,使用教师依据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第4版)(DSM-IV)症状清单所做的评分,识别出了221名患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的儿童[123名(4.5%)主要为注意力不集中型(IA),47名(1.7%)主要为多动/冲动型(HI),51名(1.9%)为混合型(C)]。将这些受试者与221名对照组儿童在行为、学业和社交功能方面的教师评分进行了比较。结果显示,每个诊断组都存在相对独立的功能损害领域。IA型儿童在所有领域都存在功能损害,但与HI型或C型儿童相比,他们被评为表现出更恰当的行为且外化问题更少。HI组表现出外化和社交问题,但在学习或内化问题方面被评为与对照组没有差异。C组在各个领域都表现出严重且普遍的困难。这些发现支持了DSM-IV中ADHD亚型的有效性;所有ADHD组相对于对照组都表现出功能损害,但呈现出不同的行为特征模式。