Suppr超能文献

为什么女性比男性更容易患建筑综合症?——主观上更高的敏感性与客观原因

Why do women suffer from sick building syndrome more often than men?--subjective higher sensitivity versus objective causes.

作者信息

Brasche S, Bullinger M, Morfeld M, Gebhardt H J, Bischof W

机构信息

Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Department of Indoor Climatology Erfurt, Gustav-Freytag-Str. 1, D-99096 Erfurt, Germany.

出版信息

Indoor Air. 2001 Dec;11(4):217-22. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0668.2001.110402.x.

Abstract

Office workers often report so-called sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms affecting the skin, mucous membranes and nervous system. The recurring higher prevalence of SBS in women was investigated using questionnaire and ergonomic data from the German ProKlimA-Project. The hypothesis that working conditions and job characteristics for women are inferior to those of men was tested for groups of risk factors. Finally, gender-specific multiple logistic regression models were compared. It was found that 44.3% of women (n = 888) and 26.2% of men (n = 576) suffer SBS with significant differences between men and women for many variables. Considering sub-groups--supposing the same circumstances in psycho-social and work-related conditions--gender-specific SBS prevalence rates differ as for the whole sample, e.g. 35.9% of women with the most favourable job characteristic suffer SBS (men: 19.4%), 53.0% of women with the most unfavourable job characteristic suffer SBS (men: 33.3%). These results show that women suffer more SBS than men independent of personal, most work-related and building factors. Multiple logistic models define self-reported acute illness, job satisfaction, software quality and job characteristics as significant gender-independent risk factors. Number of persons/room, self-reported allergy and smoking are characteristic female risk factors. Age is a significant risk factor only in men.

摘要

办公室职员经常报告出现所谓的“病态建筑综合征”(SBS)症状,这些症状会影响皮肤、黏膜和神经系统。利用德国ProKlimA项目中的问卷和人体工程学数据,对女性中反复出现的较高SBS患病率进行了调查。针对风险因素组,检验了女性的工作条件和工作特征不如男性这一假设。最后,比较了特定性别的多元逻辑回归模型。结果发现,44.3%的女性(n = 888)和26.2%的男性(n = 576)患有SBS,在许多变量上,男性和女性之间存在显著差异。考虑亚组情况——假设心理社会和工作相关条件相同——特定性别的SBS患病率与整个样本不同,例如,具有最有利工作特征的女性中有35.9%患有SBS(男性:19.4%),具有最不利工作特征的女性中有53.0%患有SBS(男性:33.3%)。这些结果表明,无论个人、大多数与工作相关的因素和建筑因素如何,女性患SBS的情况都比男性更多。多元逻辑模型将自我报告的急性疾病、工作满意度、软件质量和工作特征定义为与性别无关的显著风险因素。人均办公面积、自我报告的过敏和吸烟是女性特有的风险因素。年龄仅是男性的一个显著风险因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验