Taylor G K
Department of Zoology, Oxford University, UK.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2001 Nov;76(4):449-71. doi: 10.1017/s1464793101005759.
Insects have evolved sophisticated fight control mechanisms permitting a remarkable range of manoeuvres. Here, I present a qualitative analysis of insect flight control from the perspective of flight mechanics, drawing upon both the neurophysiology and biomechanics literatures. The current literature does not permit a formal, quantitative analysis of flight control, because the aerodynamic force systems that biologists have measured have rarely been complete and the position of the centre of gravity has only been recorded in a few studies. Treating the two best-known insect orders (Diptera and Orthoptera) separately from other insects, I discuss the control mechanisms of different insects in detail. Recent experimental studies suggest that the helicopter model of flight control proposed for Drosophila spp. may be better thought of as a facultative strategy for flight control, rather than the fixed (albeit selected) constraint that it is usually interpreted to be. On the other hand, the so-called 'constant-lift reaction' of locusts appears not to be a reflex for maintaining constant lift at varying angles of attack, as is usually assumed, but rather a mechanism to restore the insect to pitch equilibrium following a disturbance. Differences in the kinematic control mechanisms used by the various insect orders are related to differences in the arrangement of the wings, the construction of the flight motor and the unsteady mechanisms of lift production that are used. Since the evolution of insect flight control is likely to have paralleled the evolutionary refinement of these unsteady aerodynamic mechanisms, taxonomic differences in the kinematics of control could provide an assay of the relative importance of different unsteady mechanisms. Although the control kinematics vary widely between orders, the number of degrees of freedom that different insects can control will always be limited by the number of independent control inputs that they use. Control of the moments about all three axes (as used by most conventional aircraft) has only been proven for larger flies and dragonflies, but is likely to be widespread in insects given the number of independent control inputs available to them. Unlike in conventional aircraft, however, insects' control inputs are likely to be highly non-orthogonal, and this will tend to complicate the neural processing required to separate the various motions.
昆虫已经进化出复杂的飞行控制机制,使其能够进行一系列出色的机动动作。在此,我从飞行力学的角度对昆虫飞行控制进行定性分析,参考神经生理学和生物力学方面的文献。目前的文献尚无法对飞行控制进行正式的定量分析,因为生物学家所测量的气动力系统很少是完整的,而且重心位置仅在少数研究中有所记录。将两个最为人熟知的昆虫目(双翅目和直翅目)与其他昆虫分开讨论,我详细阐述了不同昆虫的控制机制。最近的实验研究表明,为果蝇属提出的飞行控制直升机模型,或许更应被视为一种飞行控制的兼性策略,而非通常所认为的固定(尽管是经过选择的)约束。另一方面,蝗虫所谓的“恒定升力反应”似乎并非如通常所假定的那样,是一种在不同攻角下维持恒定升力的反射,而是一种在受到干扰后使昆虫恢复俯仰平衡的机制。不同昆虫目所采用的运动控制机制的差异,与翅膀的排列、飞行发动机的构造以及所使用的升力产生的非定常机制的差异有关。由于昆虫飞行控制的进化可能与这些非定常空气动力学机制的进化完善并行,控制运动学方面的分类差异可以检验不同非定常机制的相对重要性。尽管不同目之间的控制运动学差异很大,但不同昆虫能够控制的自由度数量总是会受到它们所使用的独立控制输入数量的限制。对所有三个轴的力矩控制(如大多数传统飞机所采用的)仅在较大的苍蝇和蜻蜓中得到证实,但鉴于昆虫可利用的独立控制输入数量,这种控制在昆虫中可能很普遍。然而,与传统飞机不同的是,昆虫的控制输入可能高度非正交,这将使分离各种运动所需的神经处理趋于复杂。