Plymale M A, Sloan P A, Johnson M, Lafountain P, Snapp J, Vanderveer B, Sloan D A
Department of Surgery, Anesthesiology University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington 40536, USA.
Cancer Nurs. 2001 Dec;24(6):424-9. doi: 10.1097/00002820-200112000-00002.
The learning experience with the Cancer Pain Structured Clinical Instruction Module (SCIM), a highly structured skills training course for medical students, has been reported favorably. The purpose of this study was to present the Cancer Pain SCIM to registered nurses employed in a hospice setting. The goal of the study was to pilot test a structured cancer pain educational program for hospice nurses and to determine the perceived effectiveness of this course on the participants' cancer pain assessment and management skills. A multidisciplinary Cancer Pain SCIM was presented to 25 hospice nurses to improve their understanding of the management of cancer pain. The development group identified essential aspects of cancer pain management and then developed checklists defining specific station content. During the 2-hour Cancer Pain SCIM, nurses rotated through 8 stations in groups of 3, spending 15 minutes at each station. Eight instructors and 6 standardized patients, 5 of whom were survivors of cancer, participated in the course. All participants (students, instructors, and patients) evaluated the course, using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree). Nurses provided self-assessments of their perceived competence on important aspects of cancer pain management both before and after the SCIM. The self-assessment items used a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (not competent) to 5 (very competent). Twenty-five hospice nurses, averaging 4.1 years (range 1-30 years) postgraduation, participated in the Cancer Pain SCIM. Overall, nurses agreed that they improved on each of the 8 teaching items (P < 0.001). The average (SD) pretest score of 2.8 (0.72) improved to 3.8 (0.58) on the post-test (P < 0.001). Nurses believed that their mastery of specific clinical skills, taught in all 8 stations, improved as a result of participation in the course. Nurses strongly agreed (mean +/- SD) that it was beneficial to use patients with cancer in the course (4.6 +/- 0.82). Faculty members enjoyed participating in the course (4.9 +/- 0.35) and indicated a willingness to participate in future courses (4.7 +/- 0.49). Significant perceived learning among hospice nurses took place in all aspects of the Cancer Pain SCIM. Participating nurses, instructors, and patients with cancer appreciated the SCIM format. Nurses and faculty considered the participation of actual patients with cancer highly beneficial. The SCIM format has great potential to improve the quality of cancer pain education.
据报道,针对医学生的高度结构化技能培训课程——癌症疼痛结构化临床教学模块(SCIM)的学习体验良好。本研究的目的是将癌症疼痛SCIM介绍给临终关怀机构的注册护士。该研究的目标是对临终关怀护士的结构化癌症疼痛教育项目进行试点测试,并确定该课程对参与者癌症疼痛评估和管理技能的感知有效性。向25名临终关怀护士介绍了多学科癌症疼痛SCIM,以提高他们对癌症疼痛管理的理解。开发小组确定了癌症疼痛管理中重要的方面,然后制定了定义特定站点内容的检查表。在为期2小时的癌症疼痛SCIM中,护士们以3人一组的形式轮流通过8个站点,每个站点停留15分钟。8名教员和6名标准化病人(其中5名是癌症幸存者)参与了该课程。所有参与者(学生、教员和病人)使用5点李克特量表(1=强烈不同意;5=强烈同意)对课程进行了评估。护士们在癌症疼痛SCIM前后对自己在癌症疼痛管理重要方面的感知能力进行了自我评估。自我评估项目使用的是从1(不胜任)到5(非常胜任)的5点量表。25名平均毕业4.1年(范围1 - 30年)的临终关怀护士参加了癌症疼痛SCIM。总体而言,护士们一致认为他们在8个教学项目中的每一项上都有进步(P<0.001)。前测平均(标准差)得分2.8(0.72)在测试后提高到了3.8(0.58)(P<0.001)。护士们认为,由于参加了该课程,他们对在所有8个站点教授的特定临床技能的掌握有所提高。护士们强烈同意(均值±标准差)在课程中使用癌症患者是有益的(4.6±0.82)。教员们喜欢参加该课程(4.9±0.35),并表示愿意参加未来的课程(4.7±0.49)。临终关怀护士在癌症疼痛SCIM的各个方面都有显著的感知学习。参与的护士、教员和癌症患者都赞赏SCIM的形式。护士和教员认为癌症实际患者的参与非常有益。SCIM形式在提高癌症疼痛教育质量方面具有巨大潜力。