Sloan D A, Donnelly M B, Zweng T N, Lieber A, Yu G, Griffith C, Schwartz R W, Strodel W E
Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40536-0084, USA.
J Surg Res. 1995 Jun;58(6):605-10. doi: 10.1006/jsre.1995.1095.
We have previously shown that both medical students and residents demonstrate numerous important deficits when evaluating patients with abdominal complaints. To address these deficits, we implemented a pilot instructional program derived from the Objective Structured Clinical Examination. Fifty third-year medical students were presented with a 1-hr Structured Clinical Instruction Module (SCIM) of five stations, each station addressing a different aspect of the surgical evaluation of the abdomen. Simulated patients were present at two of the stations. Faculty from appropriate disciplines were present at the stations to provide standardized instruction according to predetermined curricular objectives. The medical students evaluated the SCIM for its specific characteristics, and they evaluated each of the five stations for its efficacy in increasing their clinical skills. All the specific aspects of the SCIM were given a rating significantly higher than neutral (P < 0.0001). Students agreed most strongly that the faculty were well prepared for the SCIM and that the faculty were enthusiastic. All of the SCIM stations were given a rating significantly higher than average (P < 0.0001). When compared to a conventional workshop, the SCIM scored significantly higher on all three common evaluation items. The SCIM was very well received by medical students as a format for clinical instruction. This unique modification of the Objective Structured Clinical Examination has potential for teaching important clinical skills that are not consistently mastered within current surgical curricula.
我们之前已经表明,医学生和住院医师在评估有腹部不适症状的患者时都表现出许多重要的不足之处。为了解决这些不足,我们实施了一个源自客观结构化临床考试的试点教学项目。五十名三年级医学生参加了一个为期1小时的结构化临床教学模块(SCIM),该模块有五个站点,每个站点涉及腹部外科评估的不同方面。其中两个站点有模拟患者。来自相关学科的教员在各站点根据预定的课程目标提供标准化指导。医学生对SCIM的具体特点进行了评估,并对五个站点中的每一个在提高他们临床技能方面的效果进行了评估。SCIM的所有具体方面的评分都显著高于中性评分(P < 0.0001)。学生们最强烈认同的是教员为SCIM做了充分准备且热情高涨。所有SCIM站点的评分都显著高于平均水平(P < 0.0001)。与传统工作坊相比,SCIM在所有三个常见评估项目上的得分都显著更高。作为一种临床教学形式,SCIM深受医学生欢迎。这种对客观结构化临床考试的独特改进有潜力教授当前外科课程中未能始终被掌握的重要临床技能。