Little P, Somerville J, Williamson I, Warner G, Moore M, Wiles R, George S, Smith A, Peveler R
Primary Medical Care Group, Aldemoor Health Centre, Southampton.
Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Dec;51(473):987-94.
Increasing consultation rates have implications for the organisation of health services, the quality of care, and understanding the decision to consult. Most quantitative studies have concentrated on very high attenders--not those attending five or more times a year, who are responsible for most (60%) consultations--and have assessed neither the role of lifestyle nor patients' attitudes.
To assess associations with higher than average attendance (five or more times ayear).
Postal questionnaire sent to a random sample.
Four thousand adults (one per household) from six general practices.
Data were analysed to identify predictors significantly associated with higher than average attendance.
The response rate was 74%. Sef-reported attendance agreed with the notes (r = 0.80, likelihood ratio for a positive test = 9.4). Higher attendance was independently predicted by the severity of ill health (COOP score = 0-7, 8-9, and 10+; adjusted odds ratios= 1, 1.72, 1.91 respectively; test for trend P<0.001) and the number of reported medical problems (COOP score = 0, 1, 2, and 3+ respectively; adjusted ORs = 1, 2.05, 2.31, 4.29; P<0.001). After controlling for sociodemographic variables, medical problems, the severity of physical ill health, and other confounders, high attendance was more likely in those with medically unexplained somatic symptoms (0, 1-2, 3-5, and 6+ symptoms respectively, ORs = 1, 1.15, 1.48, and 1.62; P<0.001); health anxiety (Whitely Index = 0, 1-5, 6-7 and 8+ respectively, ORs = 1, 1.22, 1.77, and 2.78; P<0.001); and poor perceived health ('very good', 'good', 'poor' respectively, ORs = 1, 1.61, and 2.93; P<0.001). Attendance was less likely in those with negative attitudes to repeated surgery use (OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.47-0.78), or to doctors (Negdoc scale <18, 18-20, and 21+ respectively; ORs = 1, 0.87, 0.67; P<0.001), in those usually trying the pharmacy first (OR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.48-0.78), and those consuming alcohol (0, 1, 2, 3+ units/day respectively; ORs = 1, 0.62, 0.41, 0.29; P<0.001). Anxiety or depression predicted perceived health, unexplained symptoms, and health anxiety.
Strategies to manage somatic symptoms, health anxiety, dealing with the causes of--or treating--anxiety and depression, and encouraging use of the pharmacy have the potential both to help patients manage symptoms and in the decision to consult. Sensitivity to the psychological factors contributing to the decision to consult should help doctors achieve a better shared understanding with their patients and help inform appropriate treatment strategies.
咨询率的上升对卫生服务的组织、护理质量以及理解咨询决策都有影响。大多数定量研究都集中在就诊率极高的人群——而非每年就诊五次或更多次的人群,而这些人占了大多数(60%)的咨询量——并且既未评估生活方式的作用,也未评估患者的态度。
评估与高于平均就诊率(每年五次或更多次)的相关因素。
向随机样本发送邮政调查问卷。
来自六个全科医疗诊所的4000名成年人(每户一人)。
对数据进行分析,以确定与高于平均就诊率显著相关的预测因素。
回复率为74%。自我报告的就诊情况与记录相符(r = 0.80,阳性检测似然比 = 9.4)。健康状况不佳的严重程度(COOP评分 = 0 - 7、8 - 9和10分及以上;调整后的优势比分别为1、1.72、1.91;趋势检验P<0.001)和报告的医疗问题数量(COOP评分分别为0、1、2和3分及以上;调整后的优势比分别为1、2.05、2.31、4.29;P<0.001)可独立预测更高的就诊率。在控制了社会人口统计学变量、医疗问题、身体疾病的严重程度和其他混杂因素后,有医学上无法解释的躯体症状(分别为0、1 - 2、3 - 5和6个及以上症状,优势比分别为1、1.15、1.48和1.62;P<0.001)、健康焦虑(怀特利指数分别为0、1 - 5、6 - 7和8分及以上,优势比分别为1、1.22、1.77和2.78;P<0.001)以及自我感觉健康状况较差(分别为“非常好”“好”“差”,优势比分别为1、1.61和2.93;P<0.001)的人群更有可能就诊率较高。对重复手术使用(优势比 = 0.61,95%置信区间 = 0.47 - 0.78)或对医生(Negdoc量表分别<18、18 - 20和21分及以上;优势比分别为1、0.87、0.67;P<0.001)持消极态度的人群、通常先尝试去药房的人群(优势比 = 0.61,95%置信区间0.48 - 0.78)以及饮酒人群(分别为每天0、1、2、3个及以上单位;优势比分别为1、0.62、0.41、0.29;P<0.001)就诊的可能性较小。焦虑或抑郁可预测自我感觉健康状况、无法解释的症状和健康焦虑。
管理躯体症状、健康焦虑、处理焦虑和抑郁的原因或进行治疗以及鼓励使用药房的策略有可能帮助患者控制症状并影响咨询决策。对导致咨询决策的心理因素保持敏感,应有助于医生与患者达成更好的共同理解,并为适当的治疗策略提供依据。