Mølster A, Gjerdet N R, Strand R M, Hole R M, Hove L M
University of Bergen, Surgical Institute, Department of Orthopedics, Haukeland University Hospital, Norway.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2001 Nov;121(10):554-6. doi: 10.1007/s004020100304.
The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the mechanical behavior of fixation by the Russell-Taylor nail with the more recent Polarus nail. Fixation with an experimental nail made from polyacetal polymer was also included in the study. Thirty humeri were fractured and randomized to receive one of the three nail types. A four-point nondestructive bending test was performed, as well as torsional testing to failure. The torsional test was designed to record the amount of 'play' (uncontrolled rotation) in the bone/implant construct. The Polarus nail gave higher rigidity of the nail/bone construct than the two other types. The Russell-Taylor nailing exhibited a high degree of 'play' (uncontrolled rotation). The polyacetal nails allowed a large elastic deformation before failure.
这项体外研究的目的是比较Russell-Taylor钉与更新的Polarus钉的固定力学行为。由聚缩醛聚合物制成的实验钉固定也包含在该研究中。三十根肱骨被骨折并随机接受三种钉类型中的一种。进行了四点无损弯曲试验以及扭转至失效试验。扭转试验旨在记录骨/植入物结构中的“间隙”(不受控制的旋转)量。Polarus钉比其他两种类型的钉/骨结构具有更高的刚度。Russell-Taylor钉固定表现出高度的“间隙”(不受控制的旋转)。聚缩醛钉在失效前允许较大的弹性变形。