Moyad M A
Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109-0330, USA.
Semin Urol Oncol. 2001 Nov;19(4):257-69.
Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has been popular in numerous countries around the world. The fairly large range of prevalence may be partially due to different definitions of CAM from a variety of researchers, patients, and the general public. Beyond prevalence issues, few studies have specifically explored the reasons for the use of CAM. Studies that have attempted to answer this question have found that issues such as distress and quality of life issues are some partial reasons for its use. Despite the fact that few, if any, CAM therapies have prolonged survival, encouraging future research into potential benefits seems warranted because some CAM therapies have preliminary encouraging results, and overall, CAM therapies are just in need of more randomized trials. Perhaps, at this time, the central focus of studies should revolve around potential improvements in quality of life issues. Some therapies have been found to potentially improve this parameter. However, during the course of certain conventional medical treatments, many CAM therapies, such as dietary supplements, should be discouraged. These could theoretically reduce the oxidative stress caused by effective treatments, such as radiation or chemotherapy, thus reducing their efficacy. Other basic lifestyle changes, such as simple dietary changes and exercise, should be encouraged during the course of treatment because of the potential benefits already demonstrated. In addition, these simple lifestyle changes may improve overall health, which is a serious issue for many patients. The prevalence of CAM should provide a challenge to health care professionals as a call to improve already existing services and communication between patients. Rather than perceiving CAM as a potential hindrance to proper conventional treatment, the reality could be that CAM is providing a unique opportunity and insight to health care professionals on how to make our current system that much better.
补充和替代医学(CAM)在世界上许多国家都很流行。其相当大的流行范围可能部分归因于不同研究者、患者和普通大众对补充和替代医学的不同定义。除了流行率问题,很少有研究专门探讨使用补充和替代医学的原因。试图回答这个问题的研究发现,诸如痛苦和生活质量问题等是其使用的一些部分原因。尽管很少有补充和替代医学疗法能延长生存期,但鼓励对潜在益处进行未来研究似乎是有必要的,因为一些补充和替代医学疗法有初步令人鼓舞的结果,而且总体而言,补充和替代医学疗法正需要更多随机试验。也许目前研究的核心重点应该围绕生活质量问题的潜在改善。已发现一些疗法可能改善这一参数。然而,在某些传统医学治疗过程中,应不鼓励使用许多补充和替代医学疗法,如膳食补充剂。从理论上讲,这些可能会降低有效治疗(如放疗或化疗)引起的氧化应激,从而降低其疗效。由于已经证明的潜在益处,在治疗过程中应鼓励进行其他基本的生活方式改变,如简单的饮食改变和锻炼。此外,这些简单的生活方式改变可能会改善整体健康,而这对许多患者来说是一个严重问题。补充和替代医学的流行应该给医疗保健专业人员带来挑战,促使他们改进现有服务以及患者之间的沟通。与其将补充和替代医学视为适当传统治疗的潜在障碍,实际情况可能是补充和替代医学为医疗保健专业人员提供了一个独特的机会和见解,让他们知道如何使我们当前的系统变得更好。