Mann T J, Orlikowski C E, Gurrin L C, Keil A D
Department of Anaesthesia, Women and Infants Research Foundation, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, Western Australia.
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2001 Dec;29(6):600-3. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0102900606.
We performed a prospective, randomized study in 55 ASA I to 3 women undergoing elective gynaecological surgery followed by postoperative epidural analgesia. We compared the incidence of bacterial colonization at the epidural exit site following catheter removal between a control group and an experimental group who received a chlorhexidine impregnated dressing (Biopatch, Johnson and Johnson, Arlington, TX, U.S.A.). Positive culture results were found in 11 of 27 (40.1%) patients in the control group compared with one of 29 (3.4%) patients whose epidural catheters were dressed with the Biopatch. We concluded that the Biopatch was effective in reducing bacterial colonization of the epidural catheter exit site.
我们对55例接受择期妇科手术并术后行硬膜外镇痛的ASA I至III级女性患者进行了一项前瞻性随机研究。我们比较了对照组和接受洗必泰浸渍敷料(美国德克萨斯州阿灵顿市强生公司的Biopatch)的实验组在拔除导管后硬膜外出口部位细菌定植的发生率。对照组27例患者中有11例(40.1%)培养结果为阳性,而使用Biopatch敷料的29例硬膜外导管患者中有1例(3.4%)培养结果为阳性。我们得出结论,Biopatch在减少硬膜外导管出口部位细菌定植方面是有效的。