Taylor M J, Heaton R K
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, USA.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2001 Nov;7(7):867-74.
This study explored the neurodiagnostic utility of 6 factor scores identified by recent exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of the WAIS-III and WMS-III: Verbal Comprehension, Perceptual Organization, Processing Speed, Working Memory, Auditory Memory and Visual Memory. Factor scores were corrected for age. education, sex and ethnicity to minimize their influences on diagnostic accuracy. Cut-offs at 1, 1.5 and 2 standard deviations (SDs) below the standardization sample mean were applied to data from the overlapping test normative samples (N = 1073) and 6 clinical samples described in the WAIS-III/WMS-III Technical Manual (N = 126). The analyses suggest that a I SD cut-off yields the most balanced levels of sensitivity and specificity; more strict (1.5 or 2 SD) cut-offs generally result in trading modest gains in specificity for larger losses in sensitivity. Finally, using combinations of WAIS-III/WMS-III factors together as test batteries, we explored the sensitivity and specificity implications of varying diagnostic decision rules (e.g.,1 vs. 2 impaired factors = "impairment"). For most of the disorders considered here, even a small (e.g., 3 factor) WAIS-III/WMS-III battery provides quite good overall diagnostic accuracy.
本研究探讨了通过对韦氏成人智力量表第三版(WAIS - III)和韦氏记忆量表第三版(WMS - III)进行近期探索性和验证性因素分析所确定的6个因素得分在神经诊断方面的效用:言语理解、知觉组织、加工速度、工作记忆、听觉记忆和视觉记忆。对因素得分进行了年龄、教育程度、性别和种族的校正,以尽量减少它们对诊断准确性的影响。将低于标准化样本均值1、1.5和2个标准差(SD)的临界值应用于重叠测试常模样本(N = 1073)的数据以及WAIS - III / WMS - III技术手册中描述的6个临床样本(N = 126)的数据。分析表明,1个标准差的临界值产生的敏感性和特异性水平最为平衡;更严格的(1.5或2个标准差)临界值通常会导致以敏感性的较大损失换取特异性的适度增加。最后,将WAIS - III / WMS - III因素组合在一起作为测试组,我们探讨了不同诊断决策规则(例如,1个与2个受损因素 = “损伤”)对敏感性和特异性的影响。对于此处考虑的大多数疾病,即使是一个小的(例如,3个因素)WAIS - III / WMS - III测试组也能提供相当好的总体诊断准确性。