Suppr超能文献

高压氧下左旋布比卡因用于脊髓麻醉:与消旋布比卡因在志愿者中的比较。

Hyperbaric spinal levobupivacaine: a comparison to racemic bupivacaine in volunteers.

作者信息

Alley Elizabeth A, Kopacz Dan J, McDonald Susan B, Liu Spencer S

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington 98111, USA.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2002 Jan;94(1):188-93, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200201000-00036.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Levobupivacaine is the isolated S-enantiomer of bupivacaine and may be a favorable alternative to spinal bupivacaine. However, its clinical efficacy relative to bupivacaine and its dose-response characteristics, in spinal anesthesia, must first be known. This double-blinded, randomized, cross-over study was designed to compare the clinical efficacy of hyperbaric levobupivacaine and bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia. Eighteen healthy volunteers were randomized into three equal groups to receive two spinal anesthetics, one with bupivacaine and the other with levobupivacaine, of equal-milligram doses (4, 8, or 12 mg). We assessed blockade quality and duration with pinprick, transcutaneous electrical stimulation, thigh tourniquet, abdominal and quadriceps muscle strength, modified Bromage scale, and time until achievement of discharge criteria. Sensory and motor block were similar between the same doses of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine (P > 0.56 to 0.86). For example, in the 12-mg groups of levobupivacaine versus bupivacaine, mean duration of tolerance to transcutaneous electrical stimulation at T12 was 100 min for both. The duration of motor block at the quadriceps was 71 versus 73 min, and time until achievement of discharge criteria was 164 min for both. Hyperbaric spinal levobupivacaine has equivalent clinical efficacy to racemic bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia in doses from 4 to 12 mg.

IMPLICATIONS

Hyperbaric spinal levobupivacaine has equivalent clinical efficacy to hyperbaric spinal bupivacaine over the 4-12-mg ranges.

摘要

未标注

左旋布比卡因是布比卡因的左旋对映体,可能是脊髓麻醉用布比卡因的一个较好替代物。然而,在脊髓麻醉中,其相对于布比卡因的临床疗效及其剂量-反应特性必须首先明确。本双盲、随机、交叉研究旨在比较重比重左旋布比卡因和布比卡因用于脊髓麻醉的临床疗效。18名健康志愿者被随机分为三组,每组人数相等,分别接受两种脊髓麻醉剂,一种是布比卡因,另一种是左旋布比卡因,剂量均为毫克等量(4、8或12毫克)。我们通过针刺、经皮电刺激、大腿止血带、腹部和股四头肌力量、改良布罗玛格量表以及达到出院标准所需时间来评估阻滞质量和持续时间。相同剂量的左旋布比卡因和布比卡因之间的感觉和运动阻滞相似(P>0.56至0.86)。例如,在左旋布比卡因和布比卡因的12毫克组中,T12水平经皮电刺激耐受的平均持续时间均为100分钟。股四头肌运动阻滞的持续时间分别为71分钟和73分钟,达到出院标准所需时间均为164分钟。4至12毫克剂量的重比重脊髓左旋布比卡因在脊髓麻醉方面与消旋布比卡因具有同等临床疗效。

启示

4至12毫克范围内,重比重脊髓左旋布比卡因与重比重脊髓布比卡因具有同等临床疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验