• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度尼西亚公立医院的成本回收床位。

Cost recovery beds in public hospitals in Indonesia.

作者信息

Suwandono A, Gani A, Purwani S, Blas E, Brugha R

机构信息

Center for Health Services/System Research, Ministry of Health, Surabaya, Indonesia.

出版信息

Health Policy Plan. 2001 Dec;16 Suppl 2:10-8. doi: 10.1093/heapol/16.suppl_2.10.

DOI:10.1093/heapol/16.suppl_2.10
PMID:11772986
Abstract

A policy of allowing public hospitals to provide some better quality, higher priced hospital beds for those able to pay was introduced as government policy in Indonesia after 1993. A study was conducted in 1998 in three public hospitals in East Java to investigate if the policy objective of cost-recovery was being achieved. Hospital revenue from these commercial beds was less than both the recurrent and total costs of providing them in all three hospitals, but exceeded recurrent costs minus staff salaries in two hospitals. One reason for the low cost-recovery ratios was that between 55% and 66% of the revenue was used as staff incentives, mostly to doctors. This was more than the maximum of 40% stipulated in the policy. The high proportions of total revenue going to staff were a result of hospital management having set bed fees too low. The policy may be contributing to the retention of doctors within public sector employment; however, it is not achieving its stated objective, especially over the longer term where full recovery of salaries and investment costs needs to be considered. Public hospitals that wish to invest in commercial beds need effective management and accounting systems so as to be able to monitor and control costs and set fees at levels that recoup the costs incurred. Further research is required to determine if this form of public-private mix has negative effects on equity and access for poorer patients.

摘要

1993年后,印度尼西亚政府出台政策,允许公立医院为有支付能力的人提供一些质量更高、价格更贵的病床。1998年,在东爪哇的三家公立医院开展了一项研究,以调查成本回收这一政策目标是否得以实现。这三家医院这些商业病床的收入均低于提供这些病床的经常性成本和总成本,但在两家医院中超过了经常性成本减去员工工资后的数额。成本回收率低的一个原因是,55%至66%的收入用作员工激励,主要是给医生。这超过了政策规定的40%的上限。总收入中很大一部分用于员工,是医院管理层将床位费定得过低所致。该政策可能有助于公立部门留住医生;然而,它并未实现其既定目标,尤其是从长期来看,需要考虑工资和投资成本的全额回收。希望投资商业病床的公立医院需要有效的管理和会计系统,以便能够监测和控制成本,并将费用设定在能够收回所产生成本的水平。需要进一步研究以确定这种公私混合形式是否会对贫困患者的公平性和就医机会产生负面影响。

相似文献

1
Cost recovery beds in public hospitals in Indonesia.印度尼西亚公立医院的成本回收床位。
Health Policy Plan. 2001 Dec;16 Suppl 2:10-8. doi: 10.1093/heapol/16.suppl_2.10.
2
The fall and rise of cost sharing in Kenya: the impact of phased implementation.肯尼亚成本分担政策的起伏:分阶段实施的影响
Health Policy Plan. 1996 Mar;11(1):52-63. doi: 10.1093/heapol/11.1.52.
3
Improving quality in public sector hospitals in Indonesia.提高印度尼西亚公立医院的质量。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 1996 Jul-Sep;11(3):275-96. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1751(199607)11:3<275::AID-HPM436>3.0.CO;2-C.
4
Decentralization in Indonesia: lessons from cost recovery rate of district hospitals.印度尼西亚的权力下放:来自地区医院成本回收率的经验教训。
Health Policy Plan. 2015 Jul;30(6):718-27. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu049. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
5
How much does excess inpatient capacity really cost?过剩的住院床位到底会造成多大成本?
Healthc Financ Manage. 1997 Apr;51(4):54-8, 60, 62.
6
Profit and loss analysis for an intensive care unit (ICU) in Japan: a tool for strategic management.日本一家重症监护病房(ICU)的损益分析:一种战略管理工具。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Jan 11;6:1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-1.
7
A model for calculating costs of hospital wards: an Italian experience.一种计算医院病房成本的模型:意大利的经验。
J Manag Med. 1999;13(2-3):71-82. doi: 10.1108/02689239910249619.
8
Estimating the unit costs of public hospitals and primary healthcare centers.估算公立医院和基层医疗中心的单位成本。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2013 Oct-Dec;28(4):320-32. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2147. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
9
The Australian health policy changes of 1999 and 2000: an evaluation.1999年和2000年澳大利亚的卫生政策变化:一项评估
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2005;4(4):229-38. doi: 10.2165/00148365-200504040-00005.
10
User fees at a public hospital in Cambodia: effects on hospital performance and provider attitudes.柬埔寨一家公立医院的用户收费:对医院绩效和医护人员态度的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Feb;58(3):553-64. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00240-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost volume profit analysis for full paying patient services in Malaysia: A study protocol.马来西亚自费患者服务的成本-量-利分析:研究方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 21;18(11):e0294623. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294623. eCollection 2023.
2
Negotiating markets for health: an exploration of physicians' engagement in dual practice in three African capital cities.协商医疗市场:对三个非洲首都城市医生从事双重执业情况的探索
Health Policy Plan. 2014 Sep;29(6):774-83. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czt071. Epub 2013 Sep 26.