Heaf James G, Løkkegaard Hans, Madsen Melvin
Department of Nephrology, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University, Denmark.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002 Jan;17(1):112-7. doi: 10.1093/ndt/17.1.112.
The influence of dialysis modality on prognosis is controversial. In the absence of randomized trials, epidemiological investigations present the best method for studying the problem.
4568 haemodialysis (HD) and 2443 peritoneal dialysis (PD) records in 4921 dialysis patients treated between 1990 and 1999 were retrieved from the Danish Terminal Uremia register in order to determine the influence of dialysis form on prognosis. The register is national, comprehensive, and incident.
Factors reducing survival included age, cardiovascular disease, malignancy, lung disease, diabetes, alcoholism, haematological disease, but not sex or hypertension. Transplant non-candidacy was associated with an adjusted relative risk of 4.7 (CI 4.0-5.6). PD mortality relative to HD (after correction for comorbidity and transplant candidacy) was 0.65 (CI 0.59-0.72, P<0.001) on an "as treated" and "history" analysis and 0.86 (CI 0.78-0.95, P<0.01) on an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. The difference was confined to the first 2 years of dialysis. Change in dialysis modality was associated with increased mortality, and change from PD to HD with an accelerated mortality for the first 6 months. This was presumably due to the transfer of sick PD patients, but did not explain the difference. The relative advantage of PD was lower for diabetic patients, where it was not significant on ITT analysis. Dialysis prognosis improved by 14% during the period, with similar results for HD and PD patients. PD patients who were subsequently transplanted had a significantly shorter time to onset of graft function (3.5 vs 5.1 days, P<0.05).
These results show a survival advantage for PD during the first 2 years of dialysis treatment. This may be due to unregistered differences in comorbidity at the start of treatment, or may be causal, possibly due to better preservation of residual renal function. The study lends credence to the "integrative care" approach to uraemia, where patients are started on PD and transferred to HD when PD related mortality increases.
透析方式对预后的影响存在争议。在缺乏随机试验的情况下,流行病学调查是研究该问题的最佳方法。
从丹麦终末期尿毒症登记处检索了1990年至1999年期间接受治疗的4921例透析患者的4568份血液透析(HD)记录和2443份腹膜透析(PD)记录,以确定透析方式对预后的影响。该登记处是全国性的、综合性的且为发病登记。
降低生存率的因素包括年龄、心血管疾病、恶性肿瘤、肺部疾病、糖尿病、酗酒、血液系统疾病,但不包括性别或高血压。不适合移植与校正后的相对风险4.7(可信区间4.0 - 5.6)相关。在“实际治疗”和“病史”分析中,相对于HD,PD的死亡率为0.65(可信区间0.59 - 0.72,P<0.001),在意向性治疗(ITT)分析中为0.86(可信区间0.78 - 0.95,P<0.01)。差异仅限于透析的前2年。透析方式的改变与死亡率增加相关,从PD转为HD在最初6个月死亡率加速上升。这可能是由于病情较重的PD患者的转移,但无法解释差异。糖尿病患者中PD的相对优势较低,在ITT分析中无显著差异。在此期间透析预后改善了14%,HD和PD患者结果相似。随后接受移植的PD患者移植物功能开始的时间显著缩短(3.5天对5.1天,P<0.05)。
这些结果显示在透析治疗的前2年中PD具有生存优势。这可能是由于治疗开始时合并症存在未登记的差异,或者可能是因果关系,可能是由于对残余肾功能的更好保留。该研究支持了尿毒症的“综合治疗”方法,即患者从PD开始治疗,当与PD相关的死亡率增加时转为HD。