Staiano A, Clouse R E
Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Dec;96(12):3258-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.05323.x.
Completeness of lower esophageal sphincter relaxation, a parameter used to establish the diagnosis of achalasia, is an important manometric determination. This study compared four analysis methods that use point-pressure measurements to determine their relative accuracy and the best threshold values for incomplete relaxation.
Analyses were performed on 153 manometric studies that employed a 21-lumen catheter with pressure recording sites spaced at 1-cm intervals. Lower sphincter relaxation was measured from most appropriate sites as the 1) lowest residual pressure within 5 s of swallowing, 2) lowest residual pressure across the entire postdeglutitive period, 3) lowest mean residual pressure over a floating 3-s interval after swallowing, and 4) mean transsphincteric esophagogastric gradient extracted from a combination of conventional and topographic manometric information. Intragastric baseline pressures were taken both from the pull-through maneuver and from concurrent intragastric recordings, and methods were compared by their receiver operating characteristics.
Best threshold values for segregating achalasia from nonachalasic controls differed across methods and depended on presence or absence of peristalsis in the comparison group. Transsphincteric gradient measurement had high sensitivity (> or = 0.94) and specificity (> or = 0.98) for achalasia irrespective of comparison group and was superior to all other methods. The 3-s mean residual pressure demonstrated greatest discriminant capabilities of the remaining conventional methods, which were modestly improved with concurrent measurement of intragastric pressure.
Analyses that average postdeglutitive pressures are superior to isolated nadir values in correctly discerning incomplete lower sphincter relaxation. The transsphincteric gradient is a novel approach for measuring sphincter relaxation, is unaffected by sphincter asymmetry and axial movement, and has the best receiver operating characteristics using point-pressure sensors.
下食管括约肌松弛的完整性是用于确诊贲门失弛缓症的一项重要测压指标。本研究比较了四种利用点压力测量来确定其相对准确性以及不完全松弛最佳阈值的分析方法。
对153项测压研究进行分析,这些研究采用了一根21腔导管,压力记录点间隔1厘米。从最合适的部位测量下括约肌松弛情况,方法如下:1)吞咽后5秒内的最低残余压力;2)整个吞咽后时期的最低残余压力;3)吞咽后浮动3秒间隔内的最低平均残余压力;4)从传统和地形测压信息组合中提取的平均跨括约肌食管胃梯度。胃内基线压力通过牵拉操作和同步胃内记录获取,并通过其受试者工作特征曲线比较这些方法。
区分贲门失弛缓症与非贲门失弛缓症对照的最佳阈值因方法而异,且取决于比较组中是否存在蠕动。无论比较组如何,跨括约肌梯度测量对贲门失弛缓症具有高敏感性(≥0.94)和高特异性(≥0.98),且优于所有其他方法。3秒平均残余压力在其余传统方法中显示出最大的判别能力,同时测量胃内压力可适度改善其判别能力。
在正确识别下括约肌不完全松弛方面,对吞咽后压力进行平均的分析方法优于孤立的最低点值。跨括约肌梯度是一种测量括约肌松弛的新方法,不受括约肌不对称和轴向移动的影响,并且使用点压力传感器时具有最佳的受试者工作特征曲线。