Suppr超能文献

紧张症的分类问题。

Classification issues in catatonia.

作者信息

Peralta V, Cuesta M J, Serrano J F, Martinez-Larrea J A

机构信息

Psychiatric Unit, Virgen del Camino Hospital, Pamplona, Spain.

出版信息

Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2001;251 Suppl 1:I14-6. doi: 10.1007/pl00014194.

Abstract

Kahlbaum described catatonia as a disorder in which mood syndromes were the primary features and the characteristic symptoms were the motor signs. In the present study, we examined the relationship between motor features and other syndromes of psychosis, the clinical validity of Kahlbaum's concept of catatonia, its relationship to schizophrenia and mood disorder, and its nosological position in relation to DSM-III-R, DSM-IV and Leonhard's classification of endogenous psychoses. Patients with Kahlbaum's catatonia differed from patients with schizophrenia or mood disorder in various demographic and clinical variables. Positive and negative motor syndromes, although interrelated, showed a different correlational pattern with other psychotic syndromes. Catatonia did not appear to fit into any particular nosological category, although this issue largely depends on whether schizophrenia and mood disorders are broadly or restrictively defined. When definitions are more restrictive as in Leonhard's system, catatonia seems to be better accommodated as a "third psychosis", i.e. described by the concept of cycloid psychosis.

摘要

卡尔鲍姆将紧张症描述为一种以情绪综合征为主要特征且特征性症状为运动体征的疾病。在本研究中,我们考察了运动特征与其他精神病综合征之间的关系、卡尔鲍姆紧张症概念的临床效度、其与精神分裂症和心境障碍的关系,以及其相对于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订本》(DSM - III - R)、《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》(DSM - IV)和莱昂哈德内源性精神病分类的疾病分类学地位。患有卡尔鲍姆紧张症的患者在各种人口统计学和临床变量方面与精神分裂症或心境障碍患者不同。阳性和阴性运动综合征虽然相互关联,但与其他精神病综合征呈现出不同的相关模式。紧张症似乎并不适合归入任何特定的疾病分类类别,不过这个问题在很大程度上取决于精神分裂症和心境障碍是被宽泛定义还是严格定义。当定义像在莱昂哈德系统中那样更为严格时,紧张症似乎更适合作为一种“第三种精神病”,即由循环性精神病概念所描述的那样。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验