Peralta V, Cuesta M J, Serrano J F, Mata I
Psychiatric Unit, Virgen del Camino Hospital, Pamplona, Spain.
Compr Psychiatry. 1997 Jan-Feb;38(1):61-7. doi: 10.1016/s0010-440x(97)90055-9.
Kahlbaum described catatonia as a disorder in which mood syndromes were the primary features and characteristic symptoms were the motor ones. However, after Kahlbaum this concept has not been taken into account and catatonia has been identified with motor features alone. In the present study, we assessed the clinical validity of Kahlbaum's concept of catatonia, its nosological position in relation to DSM-III-R, DSM-IV, and Leonhard's diagnostic criteria, and its relationships with schizophrenia and mood disorder. Of 567 patients consecutively admitted due to a functional psychotic disorder, 45 met criteria for catatonia according to Kahlbaum's concept (the Kahlbaum syndrome [KS]). Patients with the KS were differentiated from those with schizophrenia and mood disorders across a number of demographic and clinical variables, the differences being greater with the former than with the latter group. KS does not appear to fit any particular nosologic category, although this issue largely depends on whether schizophrenia and mood disorder are broadly or restrictively defined. When definitions of both disorders are most restrictive, as in the case of the Leonhard system, KS seems better accommodated as a "third psychosis". Overall, the data raise the possibility that KS is either a variant of mood disorder, or a distinct clinical entity.
卡尔鲍姆将紧张症描述为一种以情绪综合征为主要特征、以运动症状为特征性症状的疾病。然而,在卡尔鲍姆之后,这一概念未被考虑,紧张症仅被认定为具有运动特征。在本研究中,我们评估了卡尔鲍姆紧张症概念的临床有效性、其相对于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订本》(DSM - III - R)、《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》(DSM - IV)以及莱昂哈德诊断标准的疾病分类学地位,及其与精神分裂症和心境障碍的关系。在因功能性精神障碍连续入院的567例患者中,45例符合卡尔鲍姆概念下的紧张症标准(卡尔鲍姆综合征[KS])。KS患者在一些人口统计学和临床变量方面与精神分裂症患者和心境障碍患者有所区分,与后者相比,与前者的差异更大。KS似乎并不符合任何特定的疾病分类类别,尽管这个问题很大程度上取决于精神分裂症和心境障碍是广义定义还是狭义定义。当这两种障碍的定义最为严格时,如在莱昂哈德系统中,KS似乎更适合作为一种“第三种精神病”。总体而言,数据表明KS要么是心境障碍的一种变体,要么是一种独特的临床实体。