Suppr超能文献

肾下腹主动脉瘤修复术中的肾上腺或腹腔动脉上方主动脉阻断。

Suprarenal or supraceliac aortic clamping during repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.

作者信息

El-Sabrout R A, Reul G J

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Texas Heart Institute at St Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston 77030, USA.

出版信息

Tex Heart Inst J. 2001;28(4):254-64.

Abstract

Suprarenal or supraceliac aortic clamping during repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms can be complicated by renal, hepatic, and intestinal ischemia. To determine whether suprarenal or supraceliac clamping increases morbidity and mortality we retrospectively reviewed our recent nonrandomized experience. Between January 1993 and December 1998, 716 patients underwent elective (n=682) or urgent (n=34) infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Infrarenal clamping was used in 516 (72. 1 %) and suprarenal or supraceliac clamping in 200 (279%). The suprarenal/supraceliac group had significantly more older patients (> or = 70 years of age) (65.5% vs 477%) and a higher incidence of preoperative renal insufficiency (75% vs 5.5%). Suprarenal or supraceliac clamping was used during repair of ruptured (n=25), juxtarenal (n=7), or inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms (n=4); during concomitant renal or visceral revascularization (n=43); in other difficult settings (n=13); or at the surgeon's discretion (n=108). The decision for such clamping was always made during surgery In treating ruptured aneurysms, suprarenal/supraceliac clamping (25/200) was used more often than infrarenal clamping (9/516) (12.5% vs 1.74%). Operative times were similar in both groups, but transfusion requirements and length of hospital stay were slightly greater in the suprarenal/supraceliac group. Perioperative mortality was 3.1% overall, but higher in the suprarenal/ supraceliac group than in the infrarenal (75% vs 1.4%). Postoperative complications developed in 26 (13%) of patients who underwent suprarenal/supraceliac clamping. Abdominal re-exploration was required in 9 other patients. We conclude that, despite associated comorbidities, elective suprarenal/supraceliac clamping during infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is safe, facilitates repair, and does not significantly increase mortality.

摘要

在肾下腹主动脉瘤修复过程中,肾上或腹腔动脉上主动脉钳夹可能会并发肾、肝和肠道缺血。为了确定肾上或腹腔动脉上钳夹是否会增加发病率和死亡率,我们回顾性地分析了我们最近的非随机经验。在1993年1月至1998年12月期间,716例患者接受了择期(n = 682)或急诊(n = 34)肾下腹主动脉瘤修复术。516例(72.1%)采用肾下钳夹,200例(27.9%)采用肾上或腹腔动脉上钳夹。肾上/腹腔动脉上组老年患者(≥70岁)明显更多(65.5%对47.7%),术前肾功能不全的发生率更高(7.5%对5.5%)。在破裂性(n = 25)、肾旁性(n = 7)或炎性腹主动脉瘤(n = 4)修复过程中;在同时进行肾或内脏血管重建时(n = 43);在其他困难情况下(n = 13);或根据外科医生的判断(n = 108)采用肾上或腹腔动脉上钳夹。这种钳夹的决定总是在手术期间做出。在治疗破裂性动脉瘤时,肾上/腹腔动脉上钳夹(25/200)的使用频率高于肾下钳夹(9/516)(12.5%对1.74%)。两组的手术时间相似,但肾上/腹腔动脉上组的输血需求量和住院时间略长。围手术期总体死亡率为3.1%,但肾上/腹腔动脉上组高于肾下组(7.5%对1.4%)。接受肾上/腹腔动脉上钳夹的患者中有26例(13%)出现术后并发症。另有9例患者需要再次进行腹部探查。我们得出结论,尽管存在相关合并症,但在肾下腹主动脉瘤修复过程中进行择期肾上/腹腔动脉上钳夹是安全的,便于修复,且不会显著增加死亡率。

相似文献

6
Supraceliac aortic occlusion: a safe approach to pararenal aortic aneurysms.
Ann Vasc Surg. 1998 Jul;12(4):335-40. doi: 10.1007/s100169900164.

本文引用的文献

1
Renal Artery Stenosis.肾动脉狭窄
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 1999 Jun;1(1):55-62. doi: 10.1007/s11936-999-0007-7.
2
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.腹主动脉瘤
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 1999 Jun;1(1):19-26. doi: 10.1007/s11936-999-0003-y.
5
Outcome of acute renal failure following surgical repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000 Aug;20(2):163-8. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2000.1078.
8
Paraanastomotic aneurysms of the abdominal aorta: a 15-year experience review.
Cardiovasc Surg. 2000 Jun;8(4):274-9. doi: 10.1016/s0967-2109(00)00013-2.
9
Myocardial injury in major aortic surgery.
J Vasc Surg. 2000 Apr;31(4):742-50. doi: 10.1067/mva.2000.102325.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验