Büket S, Atay Y, Islamoğlu F, Yağdi T, Posacioğlu H, Alat I, Cikirikçioğlu M, Yüksel M, Durmaz I
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ege University Medical Faculty, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey.
Tex Heart Inst J. 1999;26(4):264-8.
In the surgical treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm, the single proximal cross-clamp can be placed at 3 alternative aortic levels: infrarenal, hiatal, and thoracic. We performed this retrospective study to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the 3 main aortic clamping locations. Eighty patients presented at our institution with abdominal aortic aneurysms from March 1993 through May 1998. Fifty of these patients had intact aneurysms and underwent elective surgery, and 30 had ruptured aneurysms that necessitated emergency surgery. Proximal aortic clamping was applied at the infrarenal level in 24 patients (22 from the intact aneurysm group, 2 from the ruptured group), at the hiatal level in 34 patients (22 intact, 12 ruptured), and at the thoracic level (descending aorta) via a limited left lateral thoracotomy in 22 patients (6 intact, 16 ruptured). Early mortality rates (within 30 days) were 4% (2 of 50 patients) among patients with intact aneurysms and 40% (12 of 30 patients) among those with ruptured aneurysms. In the 2 patients from the intact aneurysm group, proximal aortic clamps were applied at the hiatal level. In the ruptured aneurysm group, proximal aortic clamps were placed at the thoracic level in 10 patients, the infrarenal level in 1, and the hiatal level in 1. According to our study, the clinical status of the patient and the degree of operative urgency--as determined by the extent of the aneurysm--generally dictate the proximal clamp location. Patients who present with aneurysmal rupture or hypovolemic shock benefit from thoracic clamping, because it restores the blood pressure and allows time to replace the volume deficit. Infrarenal placement is advantageous in patients with intact aneurysms if there is sufficient space for the clamp between the renal arteries and the aortic aneurysm. In patients with juxtarenal aneurysms, hiatal clamping enables safe and easy anastomosis to the healthy aorta. Clamping at this level also helps prevent late anastomotic aneurysm formation, which is frequently encountered after inadvertent anastomosis of the graft to a diseased portion of the aorta. Further studies are needed in order to confirm these results.
在腹主动脉瘤的外科治疗中,单个近端血管夹可放置在3个不同的主动脉水平:肾下、膈上和胸段。我们进行这项回顾性研究以评估这3个主要主动脉阻断位置的优缺点。1993年3月至1998年5月期间,80例腹主动脉瘤患者在我院就诊。其中50例患者的动脉瘤完整,接受了择期手术,30例患者的动脉瘤破裂,需要进行急诊手术。24例患者(完整动脉瘤组22例,破裂组2例)在肾下水平应用近端主动脉阻断,34例患者(完整动脉瘤组22例,破裂组12例)在膈上水平应用近端主动脉阻断,22例患者(完整动脉瘤组6例,破裂组16例)通过有限的左外侧开胸术在胸段(降主动脉)应用近端主动脉阻断。完整动脉瘤患者的早期死亡率(30天内)为4%(50例患者中的2例),破裂动脉瘤患者的早期死亡率为40%(30例患者中的12例)。完整动脉瘤组的2例患者在膈上水平应用近端主动脉夹。在破裂动脉瘤组中,10例患者在胸段水平放置近端主动脉夹,1例在肾下水平,1例在膈上水平。根据我们的研究,患者的临床状况和手术紧急程度——由动脉瘤的范围决定——通常决定近端血管夹的位置。出现动脉瘤破裂或低血容量性休克的患者从胸段阻断中获益,因为它可恢复血压并留出时间补充容量不足。如果肾动脉和主动脉瘤之间有足够的空间放置血管夹,肾下放置对完整动脉瘤患者有利。对于肾旁动脉瘤患者,膈上阻断可实现与健康主动脉的安全、简便吻合。在此水平阻断还有助于预防晚期吻合口动脉瘤形成,这种情况在移植物意外吻合到主动脉病变部位后经常发生。需要进一步研究以证实这些结果。