• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以经皮冠状动脉介入治疗为主的急性心肌梗死患者结局的性别分析

Sex-based analysis of outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated predominantly with percutaneous coronary intervention.

作者信息

Mehilli Julinda, Kastrati Adnan, Dirschinger Josef, Pache Jürgen, Seyfarth Melchior, Blasini Rudolf, Hall Donald, Neumann Franz-Josef, Schömig Albert

机构信息

Deutsches Herzzentrum, Lazarettstrasse 36, 80636 Munich, Germany.

出版信息

JAMA. 2002 Jan 9;287(2):210-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.2.210.

DOI:10.1001/jama.287.2.210
PMID:11779263
Abstract

CONTEXT

A higher mortality risk for women with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a common finding in studies that compare the postinfarction outcome of women vs men. It is not clear, however, whether sex is an independent predictor of death among patients systematically treated with aggressive reperfusion and medical strategies.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of patient's sex on outcome in a consecutive series of patients with AMI treated with a reperfusion strategy largely based on percutaneous coronary interventions.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Inception cohort of 1937 patients (502 women and 1435 men) who were admitted with a diagnosis of AMI to a tertiary referral institution between January 1995 and December 2000.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mortality at 1 year after AMI.

RESULTS

Compared with men, women were older (70 vs 61 years; P<.001) and had known diabetes or hypertension more often. Both men and women received essentially identical therapy with the majority of patients (86%) receiving reperfusion therapy via percutaneous coronary interventions. There were no significant differences in 1-year Kaplan-Meier death rates with 13.8% (68 cases) among women and 12.9% (184 cases) among men (unadjusted hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.39; P =.70). After age adjustment, women had a lower risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.87; P =.004).

CONCLUSION

Despite their more advanced age and greater prevalence of diabetes or hypertension, women with AMI who were treated with a reperfusion strategy largely based on percutaneous coronary interventions show a similar outcome as men.

摘要

背景

在比较急性心肌梗死(AMI)女性与男性梗死后结局的研究中,女性较高的死亡风险是一个常见发现。然而,在接受积极再灌注和药物治疗的患者中,性别是否是死亡的独立预测因素尚不清楚。

目的

评估在一系列主要基于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的再灌注策略治疗的AMI患者中,患者性别对结局的影响。

设计、地点和患者:1995年1月至2000年12月期间,一所三级转诊机构收治的1937例诊断为AMI的患者(502例女性和1435例男性)的起始队列。

主要结局指标

AMI后1年的死亡率。

结果

与男性相比,女性年龄更大(70岁对61岁;P<0.001),且更常患有已知的糖尿病或高血压。男性和女性接受的治疗基本相同,大多数患者(86%)通过经皮冠状动脉介入治疗接受再灌注治疗。女性1年的Kaplan-Meier死亡率为13.8%(68例),男性为12.9%(184例),差异无统计学意义(未调整的风险比,1.06;95%置信区间,0.80-1.39;P = 0.70)。年龄调整后,女性的死亡风险较低(风险比,0.65;95%置信区间,0.49-0.87;P = 0.004)。

结论

尽管年龄较大且糖尿病或高血压患病率较高,但接受主要基于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的再灌注策略的AMI女性与男性结局相似。

相似文献

1
Sex-based analysis of outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated predominantly with percutaneous coronary intervention.以经皮冠状动脉介入治疗为主的急性心肌梗死患者结局的性别分析
JAMA. 2002 Jan 9;287(2):210-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.2.210.
2
Differences in prognostic factors and outcomes between women and men undergoing coronary artery stenting.接受冠状动脉支架置入术的女性和男性在预后因素及结果方面的差异。
JAMA. 2000 Oct 11;284(14):1799-805. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.14.1799.
3
Sex differences in management and outcome after acute myocardial infarction in the 1990s: A prospective observational community-based study. Israeli Thrombolytic Survey Group.20世纪90年代急性心肌梗死后治疗及预后的性别差异:一项基于社区的前瞻性观察研究。以色列溶栓调查小组
Circulation. 2000 Nov 14;102(20):2484-90. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.20.2484.
4
Comparison of baseline characteristics, clinical features, angiographic results, and early outcomes in men vs women with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary coronary intervention.接受直接冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死男性与女性患者的基线特征、临床特征、血管造影结果及早期预后比较
Chest. 2004 Jul;126(1):47-53. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.1.47.
5
Impact of sex on long-term mortality from acute myocardial infarction vs unstable angina.性别对急性心肌梗死与不稳定型心绞痛长期死亡率的影响。
Arch Intern Med. 2003 Nov 10;163(20):2476-84. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.20.2476.
6
Gender disparity in the use of drug-eluting stents during percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中药物洗脱支架使用的性别差异。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Aug;86(2):221-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25837. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
7
Usefulness of adiponectin as a predictor of all cause mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention.脂联素作为接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者全因死亡率预测因子的作用。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Feb 15;109(4):492-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.09.041. Epub 2011 Nov 19.
8
Primary coronary angioplasty vs thrombolysis for the management of acute myocardial infarction in elderly patients.老年患者急性心肌梗死治疗中,直接冠状动脉血管成形术与溶栓治疗的对比
JAMA. 1999 Jul 28;282(4):341-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.4.341.
9
Comparison of presentation, treatment, and outcome of acute myocardial infarction in men versus women (the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Registry).男性与女性急性心肌梗死的临床表现、治疗及结局比较(心肌梗死分诊与干预注册研究)
Am J Cardiol. 1996 Jul 1;78(1):9-14. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00218-4.
10
Temporal trends in clinical characteristics and management according to sex in patients with cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction: The FAST-MI programme.急性心肌梗死后心原性休克患者的临床特征和性别管理的时间趋势:FAST-MI 计划。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 Oct;111(10):555-563. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 Feb 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiogenic shock in the setting of acute myocardial infarction: Another area of sex disparity?急性心肌梗死背景下的心源性休克:另一个性别差异领域?
World J Cardiol. 2021 Jun 26;13(6):170-176. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v13.i6.170.
2
Complexity of Antiplatelet Therapy in Coronary Artery Disease Patients.冠心病患者的抗血小板治疗复杂性。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2021 Jan;21(1):21-34. doi: 10.1007/s40256-020-00414-0.
3
Sex-Related Differences in Patients at High Bleeding Risk Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Patient-Level Pooled Analysis From 4 Postapproval Studies.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中高出血风险患者的性别相关差异:4 项批准后研究的患者水平汇总分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Apr 7;9(7):e014611. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014611. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
4
Mitochondrial connexin 43 in sex-dependent myocardial responses and estrogen-mediated cardiac protection following acute ischemia/reperfusion injury.线粒体连接蛋白 43 在急性缺血/再灌注损伤后性别依赖性心肌反应和雌激素介导的心脏保护中的作用。
Basic Res Cardiol. 2019 Nov 18;115(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s00395-019-0759-5.
5
Predicting acute coronary syndrome in males and females with chest pain who call an emergency medical communication centre.预测拨打急救医疗通讯中心胸痛的男性和女性中的急性冠状动脉综合征。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Oct 17;27(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0670-y.
6
Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Women: Are There Differences When Compared with Men?女性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的结果:与男性相比有差异吗?
Interv Cardiol. 2019 May 21;14(2):70-75. doi: 10.15420/icr.2019.09. eCollection 2019 May.
7
Sex-Specific Treatment Effects After Primary Percutaneous Intervention: A Study on Coronary Blood Flow and Delay to Hospital Presentation.性别特异性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的治疗效果:对冠状动脉血流和延迟至医院就诊的研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Feb 19;8(4):e011190. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011190.
8
Sex Differences in Outcomes Following Endovascular Treatment for Symptomatic Peripheral Artery Disease: An Analysis From the K- VIS ELLA Registry.症状性外周动脉疾病血管内治疗后结局的性别差异:来自 K-VIS ELLA 登记处的分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jan 22;8(2):e010849. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010849.
9
Gender and Age Differences in Short- and Long-Term Outcomes Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后短期和长期预后的性别与年龄差异
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2014 Jul;30(4):274-83.
10
The impact of gender on long-term mortality in patients with multivessel disease after primary percutaneous coronary intervention.性别对初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后多支血管病变患者长期死亡率的影响。
Neth Heart J. 2015 Dec;23(12):592-9. doi: 10.1007/s12471-015-0754-x.