• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Investigation of infection risk and the value of urine endotoxin during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

作者信息

Li L, Shen Z, Wang H, Fu S, Cheng G

机构信息

Institute of Infectious Diseases, First Affiliated Hospital, Medical School of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.

出版信息

Chin Med J (Engl). 2001 May;114(5):510-3.

PMID:11780415
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the infection risks and the value of endotoxin determination in urine during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL).

METHODS

According to the distribution and complications of upper urinary calculi, 164 patients were divided into five groups. Group A consisted of 48 patients with 1 to 4 renal calculi, which were or less than 2 cm in diameter. Group B was composed of 24 patients with renal calculus larger than 2 cm in diameter or one to multiple renal calculi. Group C was composed of 22 patients with 1 to 3 renal calculi accompanied by 1 to 2 ureteric calculi. Group D consisted of 51 patients with 1 to 3 ureteric calculi that were 0.5 to 1.2 cm in diameter, respectively. Group E included 19 patients with complicated renal calculus, such as casting and staghorn renal calculus. Urine and blood samples of these patients were obtained before and after ESWL, respectively. Their urine samples were proven sterile prior to treatment. All samples were cultured for bacteria and investigated for endotoxin concentration by the limulus lysate test.

RESULTS

No significant difference in serum endotoxin was noted before and after ESWL. Blood bacterial cultures were all negative in all patients after ESWL, similar to those before ESWL. Significant increases in urine endotoxin after ESWL compared with that before ESWL in patients of Groups B, C and E were observed, respectively (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in urine endotoxin after ESWL compared with that before ESWL in patients of Groups A and D. The positive incidences of urine bacterial culture were significantly increased (P < 0.05) in Groups B and C and very significantly increased (P < 0.01) in Group E compared with those in Groups A and D.

CONCLUSIONS

Urinary infection risk following ESWL was lower in patients with one to several renal calculi, which were less than 2 cm in diameter and did not interfere obviously with the urine flow or in patients with 1 to 3 ureteric calculi that were 0.5 to 1.2 cm in diameter. The risk was higher in those with complicated calculi, such as casting, staghorn renal calculus, renal calculus larger than 2 cm in diameter or renal calculi accompanied by ureteric calculi. For patients with higher infection risk after ESWL, prophylactic antibiotics are necessary even if bacteriuria is not present before ESWL. Endotoxin determination in urine is a reliable, sensitive and simple method for the diagnosis of bacterial infection in patients undergoing ESWL.

摘要

相似文献

1
Investigation of infection risk and the value of urine endotoxin during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
Chin Med J (Engl). 2001 May;114(5):510-3.
2
[Investigation of infection risk and the value of antibiotic prophylaxis during transrectal biopsy of the prostate by endotoxin determination].[通过内毒素测定探讨经直肠前列腺穿刺活检期间的感染风险及抗生素预防的价值]
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2004 Jul;10(7):496-8, 502.
3
A new transportable shock-wave lithotripsy machine for managing urinary stones: a single-centre experience with a dual-focus lithotripter.一种用于治疗尿路结石的新型便携式冲击波碎石机:双焦点碎石机的单中心经验
BJU Int. 2007 Nov;100(5):1137-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07039.x. Epub 2007 Jun 5.
4
[Clinical study on antimicrobial prophylaxis following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy].体外冲击波碎石术后抗菌预防的临床研究
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1995 Apr;41(4):245-51.
5
[Clinical studies on the need of prophylactic antibiotics during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy].体外冲击波碎石术期间预防性使用抗生素必要性的临床研究
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1993 Sep;39(9):791-6.
6
[Staghorn renal lithiasis treated with shock waves. Bacteriologic aspects].[冲击波治疗鹿角形肾结石。细菌学方面]
Medicina (B Aires). 1994;54(5 Pt 1):411-4.
7
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.体外冲击波碎石术
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2005 Oct;15(10):638-41.
8
Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser.治疗近端输尿管结石的效率与成本:冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜检查联合钬:钇铝石榴石激光治疗的比较
Urology. 2004 Dec;64(6):1102-6; discussion 1106. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.07.040.
9
Treatment of ureteric lithiasis with retrograde ureteroscopy and holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy vs extracorporeal lithotripsy.输尿管镜钬激光碎石术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石的对比研究
BJU Int. 2009 Oct;104(8):1144-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08500.x. Epub 2009 Mar 13.
10
Treatment of lower urethral calculi with extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and pneumatic ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a comparison of effectiveness and complications.体外冲击波碎石术与气压弹道输尿管镜碎石术治疗下尿道结石:疗效与并发症的比较
Chin Med J (Engl). 2003 Jul;116(7):1001-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Constructing a machine learning model for systemic infection after kidney stone surgery based on CT values.基于CT值构建肾结石手术后全身感染的机器学习模型。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 5;15(1):4327. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88704-y.
2
A novel infrared spectroscopy marker for assessing the postoperative infection risk in patients with upper urinary tract calculus.一种用于评估上尿路结石患者术后感染风险的新型红外光谱标志物。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 21;14(1):19398. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69720-w.
3
Predictive Model for Systemic Infection After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Related Factors Analysis.
经皮肾镜取石术后全身感染的预测模型及相关因素分析
Front Surg. 2021 Jul 23;8:696463. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.696463. eCollection 2021.