Franken R E, Davis J
Percept Mot Skills. 1975 Aug;41(1):243-7. doi: 10.2466/pms.1975.41.1.243.
Pictures used in the test phase of a picture-recognition task were ranked by 10 university students for interestingness, pleasingness, complexity, figure-ground, and clarity. The scale values obtained from these rankings were then correlated with the errors made by other subjects in the test phase of the picture-recognition task. Figure-ground and clarity were found, for the most part, to be reliable predictors of the errors made to both the "old" and "new" subsets of pictures in two experiments. Complexity, while not as consistent a predictor of either figure-ground or clarity, was a reasonably good predictor. Interestingness and pleasingness were not reliable predictors of errors.
在一项图片识别任务的测试阶段使用的图片，由10名大学生按照趣味性、愉悦度、复杂度、图底关系和清晰度进行了排序。然后，从这些排序中获得的量表值与其他受试者在图片识别任务测试阶段所犯的错误进行了相关性分析。在两项实验中，发现图底关系和清晰度在很大程度上是图片“旧”子集和“新”子集错误的可靠预测指标。复杂度虽然不像图底关系或清晰度那样是一致的预测指标，但也是一个相当不错的预测指标。趣味性和愉悦度不是错误的可靠预测指标。
