Taylor Rodney J, Chepeha Judith C, Teknos Theodoros N, Bradford Carol R, Sharma Pramod K, Terrell Jeffrey E, Hogikyan Norman D, Wolf Gregory T, Chepeha Douglas B
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002 Jan;128(1):44-9. doi: 10.1001/archotol.128.1.44.
To validate a health-related quality-of-life (QOL) instrument for patients following neck dissection and to identify the factors that affect QOL following neck dissection.
Cross-sectional validation study.
The outpatient clinic of a tertiary care cancer center.
Convenience sample of 54 patients previously treated for head and neck cancer who underwent a selective neck dissection or modified radical neck dissection (64 total neck dissections). Patients had a minimum postoperative convalescence of 11 months. Thirty-two underwent accessory nerve-sparing modified radical neck dissection, and 32 underwent selective neck dissection.
A 10-item, self-report instrument, the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII), was developed and validated. Reliability was evaluated with test-retest correlation and internal consistency using the Cronbach alpha coefficient. Convergent validity was assessed using the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the Constant Shoulder Scale, a shoulder function test. Multiple variable regression was used to determine variables that most affected QOL following neck dissection
The 10-item NDII test-retest correlation was 0.91 (P<.001) with an internal consistency Cronbach alpha coefficient of.95. The NDII correlated with the Constant Shoulder Scale (r = 0.85, P<.001) and with the SF-36 physical functioning (r = 0.50, P<.001) and role-physical functioning (r = 0.60, P<.001) domains. Using multiple variable regression, the variables that contributed most to QOL score were patient's age and weight, radiation treatment, and neck dissection type.
The NDII is a valid, reliable instrument for assessing neck dissection impairment. Patient's age, weight, radiation treatment, and neck dissection type were important factors that affect QOL following neck dissection.
验证一种用于颈清扫术后患者的健康相关生活质量(QOL)评估工具,并确定影响颈清扫术后生活质量的因素。
横断面验证研究。
一家三级护理癌症中心的门诊。
便利样本,共54例曾接受头颈部癌治疗并接受选择性颈清扫术或改良根治性颈清扫术(共64例颈清扫术)的患者。患者术后最少康复11个月。32例行保留副神经的改良根治性颈清扫术,32例行选择性颈清扫术。
开发并验证了一种10项自评工具,即颈清扫损伤指数(NDII)。通过重测相关性和使用克朗巴赫α系数的内部一致性来评估信度。使用36项简明健康调查(SF-36)和一种肩部功能测试——Constant肩部量表来评估收敛效度。采用多元变量回归来确定颈清扫术后对生活质量影响最大的变量。
10项NDII的重测相关性为0.91(P<0.001),内部一致性克朗巴赫α系数为0.95。NDII与Constant肩部量表(r = 0.85,P<0.001)、SF-36身体功能(r = 0.50,P<0.001)和角色-身体功能(r = 0.60,P<0.001)领域相关。通过多元变量回归分析,对生活质量评分贡献最大的变量是患者的年龄、体重、放射治疗和颈清扫类型。
NDII是一种有效、可靠的评估颈清扫损伤的工具。患者的年龄、体重、放射治疗和颈清扫类型是影响颈清扫术后生活质量的重要因素。