Pantano P, Chollet F, Paulson O, von Kummer R, Laihinen A, Leenders K, Yancheva S
Department of Neurological Sciences, University "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Eur J Neurol. 2001 Nov;8(6):541-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-1331.2001.00295.x.
A Task Force on 'Teaching of Neuroimaging in Neurology Curricula in Europe' was appointed in September 1998 by the education committee of the European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS) in order to: (1) examine the present status of teaching of neuroimaging in the training of neurology in European countries, and, in particular, to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the various countries; (2) give recommendations for global improvement and harmonization of such training. A questionnaire was completed in February 1999 and sent to 35 delegates of national neurological societies. Completed questionnaires were received from 21 countries: Albania, Austria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey and UK. The questionnaire revealed that the situation in Europe is highly heterogeneous, both as regards the training in neurology in general and, more specifically, the teaching of neuroimaging during the training. Some recommendations to make the teaching of neuroimaging more homogeneous across European countries and to improve it are provided.
1998年9月,欧洲神经科学学会联合会(EFNS)教育委员会任命了一个“欧洲神经病学课程中的神经影像学教学”特别工作组,目的是:(1)研究欧洲国家神经病学培训中神经影像学教学的现状,特别是评估各国的优势和劣势;(2)就此类培训的全球改进与协调提出建议。1999年2月完成了一份调查问卷,并发送给35个国家神经病学学会的代表。收到了来自21个国家的完整调查问卷,这些国家是:阿尔巴尼亚、奥地利、克罗地亚、捷克共和国、丹麦、爱沙尼亚、芬兰、德国、希腊、匈牙利、以色列、意大利、荷兰、挪威、波兰、葡萄牙、斯洛伐克、西班牙、瑞士、土耳其和英国。调查问卷显示,欧洲的情况非常多样化,无论是在神经病学的总体培训方面,还是更具体地说,在培训期间的神经影像学教学方面。文中提供了一些建议,以使欧洲各国的神经影像学教学更加统一并加以改进。