Zelinski E M, Burnight K P, Lane C J
Leonard Davis School of Gerontology, USA.
J Aging Health. 2001 May;13(2):248-66. doi: 10.1177/089826430101300205.
To evaluate the hypotheses that subjective memory ratings are more accurate in the oldest old than in the young old and more accurate in a representative sample than in a convenience sample.
Outcomes of hierarchical regressions of subjective ratings and participant characteristics on recall were compared between a nationally representative sample of 6,446 adults ages 70 to 103 and a convenience sample of 326 adults ages 70 to 97.
Education interacted with memory ratings in the prediction of performance in the representative sample, with better prediction for more highly educated participants than for participants with lower levels of education.
The general pattern of findings was consistent across both samples and neither hypothesis was supported. Possible explanations for the similarity of results across samples are considered.
评估以下假设,即主观记忆评分在高龄老人中比在低龄老人中更准确,且在代表性样本中比在便利样本中更准确。
在一个由6446名70至103岁成年人组成的全国代表性样本和一个由326名70至97岁成年人组成的便利样本之间,比较了主观评分和参与者特征对回忆的分层回归结果。
在代表性样本中,教育程度与记忆评分在预测表现方面存在交互作用,对受教育程度较高的参与者的预测比对受教育程度较低的参与者更好。
两个样本的总体研究结果模式一致,且两个假设均未得到支持。文中考虑了样本间结果相似性的可能解释。