Mehta Rajendra H, Suzuki Toru, Hagan Peter G, Bossone Eduardo, Gilon Dan, Llovet Alfredo, Maroto Luis C, Cooper Jeanna V, Smith Dean E, Armstrong William F, Nienaber Christoph A, Eagle Kim A
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109, USA.
Circulation. 2002 Jan 15;105(2):200-6. doi: 10.1161/hc0202.102246.
Given the high mortality rates in patients with type A aortic dissection, predictive tools to identify patients at increased risk of death are needed to assist clinicians for optimal treatment.
Accordingly, we evaluated 547 patients with this diagnosis enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) between January 1996 and December 1999. Univariate testing followed by multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of death. In-hospital mortality rate was 32.5% in type A dissection patients. In-hospital complications (neurological deficits, altered mental status, myocardial or mesenteric ischemia, kidney failure, hypotension, cardiac tamponade, and limb ischemia) were increased in patients who died compared with survivors (P<0.05 for all). Logistic regression identified the following presenting variables as predictors of death: age > or =70 years (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.05 to 2.77; P=0.03), abrupt onset of chest pain (OR 2.60; 95% CI, 1.22 to 5.54; P=0.01), hypotension/shock/tamponade (OR, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.83 to 4.81; P<0.0001), kidney failure (OR, 4.77; 95% CI, 1.80 to 12.6; P=0.002), pulse deficit (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.25 to 3.29, P=0.004), and abnormal ECG (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.06 to 2.95; P=0.03) (area under receiver operating curve, 0.74; Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic, P=0.75).
The in-hospital mortality rate in acute type A aortic dissection is high and can be predicted with the use of a clinical model incorporated in a simple risk prediction tool. This tool can be used to educate patients with dissection about their predicted risk and in clinical research for risk adjustment while comparing outcomes of different therapies.
鉴于A型主动脉夹层患者的高死亡率,需要有预测工具来识别死亡风险增加的患者,以帮助临床医生进行最佳治疗。
因此,我们评估了1996年1月至1999年12月期间纳入国际急性主动脉夹层注册研究(IRAD)的547例诊断为此病的患者。进行单因素检验,随后进行多因素逻辑回归分析,以确定死亡的独立预测因素。A型夹层患者的院内死亡率为32.5%。与幸存者相比,死亡患者的院内并发症(神经功能缺损、精神状态改变、心肌或肠系膜缺血、肾衰竭、低血压、心脏压塞和肢体缺血)有所增加(所有P<0.05)。逻辑回归确定以下呈现变量为死亡预测因素:年龄≥70岁(比值比[OR]为1.70;95%置信区间[CI]为1.05至2.77;P=0.03)、胸痛突然发作(OR为2.60;95%CI为1.22至5.54;P=0.01)、低血压/休克/心脏压塞(OR为2.97;95%CI为1.83至4.81;P<0.0001)、肾衰竭(OR为4.77;95%CI为1.80至12.6;P=0.002)、脉搏短绌(OR为2.03;95%CI为1.25至3.29,P=0.004)和心电图异常(OR为1.77;95%CI为1.06至2.95;P=0.03)(受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.74;Hosmer-Lemeshow统计量,P=0.75)。
急性A型主动脉夹层的院内死亡率很高,可使用纳入简单风险预测工具的临床模型进行预测。该工具可用于告知夹层患者其预测风险,并用于临床研究中的风险调整,同时比较不同治疗方法的结果。