Simanjuntak C H, Larasati W, Arjoso S, Putri M, Lesmana M, Oyofo B A, Sukri N, Nurdin D, Kusumaningrum R P, Punjabi N H, Subekti D, Djelantik S, Lubis A, Siregar H, Mas'ud B, Abdi M, Sumardiati A, Wibisana S, Setiawan B, Santoso W, Putra E, Sarumpaet S, Ma'ani H, Lebron C, Soeparmanto S A, Campbell J R, Corwin A L
National Institute of Health Research and Development, Ministry of Health, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001 Dec;65(6):788-97. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2001.65.788.
Cholera-specific surveillance in Indonesia was initiated to identify the introduction of the newly recognized Vibrio cholerae non-O1, O139 serotype. Findings from seven years (1993-1999) of surveillance efforts also yielded regional profiles of the importance of cholera in both epidemic and sporadic diarrheal disease occurrence throughout the archipelago. A two-fold surveillance strategy was pursued involving 1) outbreak investigations, and 2) hospital-based case recognition. Rectal swabs were transported to Jakarta for culture and isolates were characterized by serotypic identification. Outbreak findings showed that V. cholerae O1, Ogawa serotype, was the predominant etiology in all 17 instances of investigated epidemic transmission. Monitoring of eight hospitals representing seven provinces provided 6,882 specimens, of which 9% were culture positive for V. cholerae: 589 (9%) for O1 and 20 (< 1%) for non-O1 strains. Proportional representation of V. cholerae O1 among cases of sporadic diarrheal illness was variable, ranging from 13% in Jakarta to < 1% in Batam. Overall, 98% of V. cholerae O1 cases were the Ogawa serotype. There was no instance of non-O1, O139 serotype introduction in either epidemic or sporadic disease form. Anti-microbial drug susceptibility was consistently demonstrated, both temporally and spatially, except against colistin. Evidence is provided that epidemic and sporadic cholera occurrence in western Indonesia is associated with periods of low rainfall. Conversely, in the more eastern portion of the country, heavy rainfall may have contributed to epidemic cholera transmission.
印度尼西亚启动了霍乱专项监测,以确定新发现的非O1、O139血清型霍乱弧菌的传入情况。七年(1993 - 1999年)监测工作的结果还得出了霍乱在整个群岛的流行和散发性腹泻疾病发生中的重要性的区域概况。采用了双重监测策略,包括1)疫情调查,以及2)基于医院的病例识别。直肠拭子被送往雅加达进行培养,分离株通过血清型鉴定进行特征分析。疫情调查结果显示,在所有17起调查的疫情传播事件中,霍乱弧菌O1小川血清型是主要病因。对代表七个省份的八家医院的监测提供了6882份标本,其中9%的标本霍乱弧菌培养呈阳性:O1型589份(9%),非O1菌株20份(<1%)。霍乱弧菌O1在散发性腹泻病例中的比例各不相同,从雅加达的13%到巴淡岛的<1%不等。总体而言,98%的霍乱弧菌O1病例为小川血清型。在疫情或散发性疾病形式中均未出现非O1、O139血清型的传入情况。除对黏菌素外,抗菌药物敏感性在时间和空间上均持续表现出来。有证据表明,印度尼西亚西部的霍乱流行和散发与降雨少的时期有关。相反,在该国东部地区,暴雨可能促成了霍乱的流行传播。