Vyas Pranav K, Vesy Thomas L, Konez Orhan, Ciavellara David P, Hua Keidang, Gaisie Godfrey
Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Medical Center of Akron, Akron, Ohio, USA.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002 Jan;15(1):75-81. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10034.
To evaluate the utility of magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) in estimation of gallbladder ejection fraction (GBEF) and to comparing this value to the conventional method, hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS).
Twenty-one healthy volunteers were imaged on sequential weeks to determine GBEF using MRC and HBS. GBEF was calculated by HBS after infusion of 20 ng/kg of sincalide following injection of 111 Mbq of Tc 99(m) mebrofenin. For estimation by MRC, imaging of the gallbladder was performed before and after slow infusion of sincalide every 5 minutes, for a total of 60 minutes. Gallbladder imaging was performed using a heavily T2-weighted 2D fast spin echo (FSE) sequence. Data was analyzed using a variance component analysis technique.
Mean GBEF by HBS was 65.7%, with an SD of +/-27.3%. Mean GBEF by MRC was 62.7%, with an SD of +/- 20.4%. If minimum normal GBEF is set at 35%, two of the cases showed discordance, with HBS calculating an abnormally low average GBEF compared to MRC. Additionally, two cases showed abnormally low GBEF for both modalities. The coefficient of correlation between HBS and MRC was 0.72. Inter- and intraobserver variance is acceptable within the two modalities with <1.1% variation.
GBEF can be calculated with MRC, yielding similar values when a group of volunteers are considered. Further study with symptomatic patients is needed to determine the validity of this technique for clinical diagnosis.
评估磁共振胆胰管造影(MRC)在估计胆囊排空分数(GBEF)中的效用,并将该值与传统方法肝胆闪烁显像(HBS)进行比较。
21名健康志愿者连续数周接受成像检查,使用MRC和HBS测定GBEF。在注射111兆贝克勒尔的锝99(m)美洛昔芬后,静脉注射20纳克/千克的辛卡利特,然后通过HBS计算GBEF。为通过MRC进行估计,每隔5分钟缓慢注射辛卡利特,共注射60分钟,在注射前后对胆囊进行成像。使用重T2加权二维快速自旋回波(FSE)序列进行胆囊成像。采用方差成分分析技术对数据进行分析。
HBS测得的平均GBEF为65.7%,标准差为±27.3%。MRC测得的平均GBEF为62.7%,标准差为±20.4%。如果将最小正常GBEF设定为35%,有两例结果不一致,与MRC相比,HBS计算出的平均GBEF异常低。此外,有两例在两种检查方法中GBEF均异常低。HBS与MRC之间的相关系数为0.72。在两种检查方法中,观察者间和观察者内的差异均在可接受范围内,变异率<1.1%。
MRC可用于计算GBEF,在一组志愿者中得出的结果相似。需要对有症状的患者进行进一步研究,以确定该技术用于临床诊断的有效性。