Ziessman H A, Fahey F H, Hixson D J
Department of Radiology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007.
J Nucl Med. 1992 Apr;33(4):537-41.
The purpose of this study was to investigate alternative methods of infusing sincalide for calculation of a gallbladder ejection fraction (GBEF) during cholescintigraphy (5 mCi 99mTc-mebrofenin). After gallbladder filling, three methods of infusion were compared in 23 normal volunteers: (1) 0.02 microgram/kg as a 3-min infusion, (2) 0.02 microgram/kg as a 30-min infusion, and (3) 0.01 microgram/kg as a 30-min infusion (14 subjects), all performed on separate days. With the 3-min infusion, the emptying pattern was usually exponential and completed in 15 min. The mean (GBEF) was 52% +/- 26% at 20 min and 56% +/- 27% at 30 min (range 0%-100%). GBEFs were less than 35% in six subjects and 35%-38% in four. Side effects were noted by 11/23 subjects. With the slow infusions, emptying was linear; no side effects were noted. With 0.02 microgram/kg, the mean GBEF was 50% +/- 27% at 20 min and 70% +/- 22% at 30 min (range 26%-95%). Similar results were seen with 0.01 microgram/kg, but the data were more limited. The 30-min infusion had a higher normalcy rate than the 3-min method (91% versus 74%). Females had significantly lower GBEFs than males (p less than 0.05%). We conclude that the slow infusion method is preferable; it is more physiological, results in more complete emptying, has no side effects, has less normal variability, and should improve the specificity of this test. The lower mean female GBEF may have pathophysiological significance.
本研究的目的是探讨在胆囊闪烁显像(5mCi 99m锝-甲溴菲宁)期间输注辛卡利特以计算胆囊射血分数(GBEF)的替代方法。在胆囊充盈后,对23名正常志愿者比较了三种输注方法:(1)以0.02微克/千克的剂量在3分钟内输注,(2)以0.02微克/千克的剂量在30分钟内输注,以及(3)以0.01微克/千克的剂量在30分钟内输注(14名受试者),所有操作均在不同日期进行。采用3分钟输注时,排空模式通常呈指数形式,在15分钟内完成。20分钟时平均GBEF为52%±26%,30分钟时为56%±27%(范围为0%-100%)。6名受试者的GBEF低于35%,4名受试者的GBEF在35%-38%之间。11/23的受试者出现了副作用。采用缓慢输注时,排空呈线性;未观察到副作用。采用0.02微克/千克时,20分钟时平均GBEF为50%±27%,30分钟时为70%±22%(范围为26%-95%)。采用0.01微克/千克时也观察到了类似结果,但数据较为有限。30分钟输注的正常率高于3分钟方法(91%对74%)。女性的GBEF显著低于男性(p<0.05%)。我们得出结论,缓慢输注方法更可取;它更符合生理,导致排空更完全,无副作用,正常变异性更小,并且应能提高该检查的特异性。女性较低的平均GBEF可能具有病理生理学意义。