The administration of school-based mental health services.

Challenges and proposed solutions in the administration of school-based mental health services have been addressed. Differences depend on whether the services are provided by the mental health component of an SBHC or by an ISBMHP. Seven common elements relevant in developing and administering school-based mental health services, whether in an SBHC or ISBMHP, have been identified: funding, assessment and resources, program structure, staffing and training, partnership and collaboration, quality assurance, and evaluation. How these elements are addressed varies from school district to indivdual school to individual principal to agencies providing services to specific clinicians. One of the most important lessons learned is that the ecosystem of each school is different; one size does not fit all. When external agencies enter a school, they are in the best case guests, in the worst case foreigners or invaders. Agencies and their clinicians must be respectful, adaptable, flexible, and competent professionals. With such attributes, the chance for an effective collaboration is enhanced. Contributions of school-based mental health services to the child and adolescent mental health delivery system include (1) access to services for disadvantaged and underserved youth, (2) system-wide collaboration, (3) prevention of acute psychiatric intervention, (4) gate-keeper role for more acute or specialized care, (5) systematic program evaluation in a "naturalistic" setting, (6) professional training in working with a range of systems and cultures, and (7) outreach and community-based care. With the emphasis on partnership and collaboration, school-based programs have the potential to benefit the children and families, schools, communities, and managed care organizations. The provision of access and early intervention is cost effective in the long run, and findings indicate that school-based mental health service is as effective as that of a central clinic. With the emphasis on collaboration, partnership, and bridging systems and cultures, the provision of school-based mental health care may be able to offer tools and experience to create integrated systems of care. This is a reciprocal process and an ongoing dialectic, however. Providers and planners of a school-based mental health programs, schools, and managed-care leaders can learn from one another, and all have major contributions to make to the overall delivery system. Schools and mental health service providers contribute knowledge and skills in working with this population; managed care organizations bring administrative and fiscal expertise and a focus on and mandate for quality and cost-effective care. For-profit and not-for-profit agencies must enter into a dialogue to educate and understand each other so that they may become collaborators in the underutilized service for children and youth.