Lock M
Department of Social Studies of Medicine, Department of Anthropology, McGill University.
Med Anthropol Q. 2001 Dec;15(4):478-92. doi: 10.1525/maq.2001.15.4.478.
This article reviews an approach in medical anthropology that commenced in the early 1980s and that continues to the present day in which biomedical knowledge and practices are systematically incorporated into anthropological analyses. Discussion then focuses on contributions made by feminists and medical anthropologists to the literature on medicalization and resistance, illustrating how the ethnographic approach has been crucial in critically reconceptualizing and situating these concepts historically and cross-culturally. The concept of local biologies is introduced in the third section of the article in creating the argument that the coproduction of biologies and cultures contributes to embodied experience, which, in turn, shapes discourse about the body. Subjective reporting at menopause provides an illustrative case study of local biologies in action. The final part of the article takes up the question of the moral economy of scientific knowledge. Comparative ethnographic work in intensive care units in Japan and North America reveals how a moral economy is put into practice in connection with brain-dead bodies and the procurement of organs from them. Medical anthropological contributions to policy making about biomedical technologies is briefly considered in closing.
本文回顾了医学人类学领域中一种始于20世纪80年代初并一直持续至今的研究方法,该方法将生物医学知识与实践系统地纳入人类学分析。随后的讨论聚焦于女权主义者和医学人类学家对医学化及抵抗相关文献的贡献,阐明了民族志方法在从历史和跨文化角度批判性地重新概念化并定位这些概念方面如何发挥关键作用。文章第三部分引入了“地方生物学”的概念,论证了生物学与文化的共同生产如何促成具身经验,而具身经验又反过来塑造关于身体的话语。更年期的主观报告提供了一个地方生物学实际应用的例证性案例研究。文章最后一部分探讨了科学知识的道德经济问题。对日本和北美的重症监护病房进行的比较民族志研究揭示了与脑死亡尸体及其器官获取相关的道德经济是如何付诸实践的。结语部分简要考虑了医学人类学对生物医学技术政策制定的贡献。