Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Department of History, University of Durham, Durham, UK.
Med Humanit. 2022 Mar;48(1):63-75. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2019-011816. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
Breathlessness is a sensation affecting those living with chronic respiratory disease, obesity, heart disease and anxiety disorders. The Multidimensional Dyspnoea Profile is a respiratory questionnaire which attempts to measure the incommunicable different sensory qualities (and emotional responses) of breathlessness. Drawing on sensorial anthropology we take as our object of study the process of turning sensations into symptoms. We consider how shared cultural templates of 'what counts as a symptom' evolve, mediate and feed into the process of bodily sensations becoming a symptom. Our contribution to the field of sensorial anthropology, as an interdisciplinary collaboration between history, anthropology and the medical humanities, is to provide a critique of how biomedicine and cultures of clinical research have measured the multidimensional sensorial aspects of breathlessness. Using cognitive interviews of respiratory questionnaires with participants from the Breathe Easy groups in the UK, we give examples of how the wording used to describe sensations is often at odds with the language those living with breathlessness understand or use. They struggle to comprehend and map their bodily experience of sensations associated with breathlessness to the words on the respiratory questionnaire. We reflect on the alignment between cognitive interviewing as a method and anthropology as a disciplinary approach. We argue biomedicine brings with it a set of cultural assumptions about what it means to measure (and know) the sensorial breathless body in the context of the respiratory clinic (clinical research). We suggest the mismatch between the descriptions (and confusion) of those responding to the respiratory questionnaire items and those selecting the vocabularies in designing it may be symptomatic of a type of historical testimonial epistemic injustice, founded on the prioritisation of clinical expertise over expertise by experience.
呼吸困难是一种影响慢性呼吸系统疾病、肥胖症、心脏病和焦虑症患者的感觉。多维呼吸困难量表是一种呼吸系统问卷,旨在测量呼吸困难不可言传的不同感觉质量(和情绪反应)。借鉴感官人类学,我们将感觉转变为症状的过程作为我们的研究对象。我们考虑“什么算作症状”的共享文化模板如何演变、调节和影响身体感觉成为症状的过程。我们作为历史、人类学和医学人文之间的跨学科合作,为感官人类学领域做出的贡献是,对生物医学和临床研究文化如何衡量呼吸困难的多维感官方面进行批判。通过对来自英国呼吸轻松小组的参与者进行认知访谈,我们举例说明了描述感觉的措辞常常与呼吸困难患者理解或使用的语言不一致。他们难以理解和将与呼吸困难相关的身体感觉映射到呼吸系统问卷上的文字上。我们反思了认知访谈作为一种方法和人类学作为一种学科方法之间的一致性。我们认为,生物医学带来了一系列关于在呼吸诊所(临床研究)背景下衡量(和了解)感官呼吸身体的文化假设。我们认为,那些对呼吸系统问卷项目做出反应的人的描述(和困惑)与设计它的人选择词汇之间的不匹配可能是一种历史见证知识不公正的症状,这种不公正基于临床专业知识的优先化,而不是基于经验的专业知识。