Kratovits A, Punning J M
Tallinn Pedagogical University, Tallinn, Estonia.
Ambio. 2001 Nov;30(7):443-9. doi: 10.1579/0044-7447-30.7.443.
The article elaborates on the role of international environmental regimes and multilateral environmental agreements in the process of development of environmental policy in the 3 Baltic countries; Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. Comparison of emission trends and changes in the state of the environment with reference to international environmental regimes allow one to conclude that there is no clear link between the official accession to environmental conventions and changes in environmental fields. The Baltic countries first joined international environmental regimes dealing with global or regional environmental security, while acceptance of the agreements and accession to regimes seen as more important from the point of view of solving their own environmental problems, took place later. Therefore, it can be concluded that the Baltic countries have seen the international legal instruments in their environmental policies as preventive, rather than curative instruments. Active participation in multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs) has, on the other hand, substantially contributed to the readiness of the Baltic countries to take the next step in their environmental policy--taking over the environmental policies (Acquis Communautaire) of the European Union.
本文阐述了国际环境制度和多边环境协定在爱沙尼亚、拉脱维亚和立陶宛这三个波罗的海国家环境政策发展过程中的作用。通过参照国际环境制度对排放趋势和环境状况变化进行比较,可以得出结论:正式加入环境公约与环境领域的变化之间没有明确的联系。波罗的海国家首先加入了处理全球或区域环境安全问题的国际环境制度,而从解决自身环境问题的角度来看,接受那些被视为更为重要的协定并加入相关制度则是后来才发生的。因此,可以得出结论,波罗的海国家在其环境政策中把国际法律文书视为预防性而非补救性工具。另一方面,积极参与多边环境协定极大地促进了波罗的海国家为其环境政策迈出下一步——采纳欧盟的环境政策(共同体既有法规)做好准备。