Suppr超能文献

快速眼动睡眠剥夺对多重食欲强化程序的影响。

Effects of REM sleep deprivation on a multiple schedule of appetitive reinforcement.

作者信息

Kennedy Craig H

机构信息

John F. Kennedy Center, Vanderbilt University, Box 40, Peabody College, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.

出版信息

Behav Brain Res. 2002 Jan 22;128(2):205-14. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00322-9.

Abstract

The effects of rapid eye movement sleep deprivation (REMSD) on appetitively reinforced responding by rats was studied in two experiments. In Experiment 1, a lever press was maintained on a baseline multiple FR 30 FI 60-s schedule of reinforcement that was reestablished after each experimental manipulation. Animals were then repeatedly exposed to 24, 48, or 96 h of REMSD and equivalent periods of tank control and cage control conditions. For all animals responding was reduced only after 96 h of REMSD, but tolerance to REMSD developed following repeated exposures. Experiment 2, replicated the procedures of Experiment 1 except that the apparatus was modified to prevent ad libitum access to REMSD during operant sessions. Animals were repeatedly exposed to 96 h of REMSD and equivalent periods of tank control and cage control conditions. No reduction in responding was observed in Experiment 2. The current findings, in conjunction with previous research, suggest that REMSD may have qualitatively different effects on responding maintained by positive versus negative reinforcement.

摘要

在两项实验中研究了快速眼动睡眠剥夺(REMSD)对大鼠由食欲强化的反应的影响。在实验1中,在基线多重固定比率30固定间隔60秒的强化程序上维持杠杆按压,每次实验操作后重新建立该程序。然后让动物反复经历24、48或96小时的快速眼动睡眠剥夺以及同等时长的水槽对照和笼养对照条件。对于所有动物,仅在96小时的快速眼动睡眠剥夺后反应才减少,但反复暴露后对快速眼动睡眠剥夺产生了耐受性。实验2重复了实验1的程序,只是对实验装置进行了改良,以防止在操作训练期间随意进入快速眼动睡眠剥夺状态。让动物反复经历96小时的快速眼动睡眠剥夺以及同等时长的水槽对照和笼养对照条件。在实验2中未观察到反应减少。当前的研究结果与先前的研究相结合,表明快速眼动睡眠剥夺对由正强化和负强化维持的反应可能具有质的不同影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验