Thompson Travis
Autism Program, Department of Pediatrics, MMC 486 Mayo, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, 420 Delaware, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 May;87(3):423-40. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2007.21-06.
This paper proposes that an organism's integrated repertoire of operant behavior has the status of a biological system, similar to other biological systems, like the nervous, cardiovascular, or immune systems. Evidence from a number of sources indicates that the distinctions between biological and behavioral events is often misleading, engendering counterproductive explanatory controversy. A good deal of what is viewed as biological (often thought to be inaccessible or hypothetical) can become publicly measurable variables using currently available and developing technologies. Moreover, such endogenous variables can serve as establishing operations, discriminative stimuli, conjoint mediating events, and maintaining consequences within a functional analysis of behavior and need not lead to reductionistic explanation. I suggest that explanatory misunderstandings often arise from conflating different levels of analysis and that behavior analysis can extend its reach by identifying variables operating within a functional analysis that also serve functions in other biological systems.
本文提出,生物体操作性行为的综合技能库具有生物系统的地位,类似于其他生物系统,如神经、心血管或免疫系统。来自多个来源的证据表明,生物事件和行为事件之间的区别往往具有误导性,会引发适得其反的解释性争议。许多被视为生物学的东西(通常被认为是难以接近或假设性的),利用现有的和正在发展的技术,可以成为可公开测量的变量。此外,这些内源性变量可以作为建立操作、辨别性刺激、联合中介事件,并在行为功能分析中作为维持结果,而且不必导致还原论的解释。我认为,解释性误解往往源于混淆不同的分析层次,行为分析可以通过识别在功能分析中起作用且在其他生物系统中也发挥功能的变量来扩大其范围。